Completed
Case Information
Filed: April 07, 2026
Assigned to:
Todd Wallace Robinson
Referred to:
David D. Leshner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Completed: April 14, 2026
Last Activity:
May 01, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Apr 07, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Todd Blanche, Field Office Director, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, Warden ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ACASDC-21003795.), filed by Rohit Rohit. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:26-cv-2194-TWR-DDL. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Girn, Sukhveer)(gsw) (sjt). (Entered: 04/08/2026)
#2
Apr 08, 2026
MINUTE ORDER. The Court ORDERS Respondents TO SHOW CAUSE on or before April 13, 2026, why Petitioner should not be granted an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).(no document attached) (sxm3) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
#3
Apr 08, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rohit Rohit. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Affidavit, # 3 Affidavit)(Girn, Sukhveer) (Entered: 04/08/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
Apr 08, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines
#6
Apr 14, 2026
MINUTE ORDER Having reviewed Respondents' 4 Response and in accordance with this Court's prior Orders, see, e.g., Minute Entry, Vasquez-Diaz v. LaRose, No. 25-cv-3038 TWR (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2025), ECF No. 6, the Court GRANTS the Petition and ORDERS Respondent to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within fourteen days. Respondent SHALL NOT deny Petitioner's bond on the basis that 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) requires mandatory detention. Petitioner's 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED AS MOOT.(no document attached) (sxm3) (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Apr 14, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
#7
Apr 27, 2026
Reconsideration
Main Document:
Reconsideration
#8
Apr 28, 2026
MINUTE ORDER. Presently before the Court is Petitioner's 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Petitioner received a bond hearing and now seeks review of the immigration judge's denial of bond. (See ECF No. 7) Because Petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by appealing to the Board of Immigration Appeals and has not raised any basis for waiving exhaustion, the Court DENIES the 7 Motion. See Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1161 (9th Cir. 2011) (remanding with the instruction to dismiss the petition without prejudice because the petitioner had not exhausted his administrative remedies nor demonstrated grounds for excusing exhaustion). (no document attached) (sxm3) (Entered: 04/28/2026)
Apr 28, 2026
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
#10
May 01, 2026
MINUTE ORDER. Presently before the Court is Petitioner's second 9 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court denied Petitioner's first 7 Motion for Reconsideration on grounds that Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by appealing to the Board of Immigration Appeals and did not raise any basis for waiving exhaustion. (See ECF No. 7.) Finding Petitioner's second 9 Motion for Reconsideration does not indicate that Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, the Court DENIES the Motion. (no document attached) (sxm3) (Entered: 05/01/2026)
May 01, 2026
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
Parties
Rohit
Party
Warden
Party