Central District of California • 5:26-cv-06622

Jiafang Yang v. James Janecka

Active

Case Information

Filed: November 06, 2026
Assigned to: Rozella A. Oliver
Referred to: —
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity: November 09, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Nov 06, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-43767095 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner JIAFANG YANG. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Hanzhang Xu added to party JIAFANG YANG(pty:pet))(Xu, Hanzhang) (Entered: 11/06/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Nov 06, 2026
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Immediate Release filed by Petitioner JIAFANG YANG. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Xu, Hanzhang) (Entered: 11/06/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Nov 06, 2026
The Petitioner has voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jtil) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/06/2026)
#4
Nov 06, 2026
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) (Entered: 11/06/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
#5
Nov 06, 2026
Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (jtil) (Entered: 11/06/2026)
Main Document: Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#6
Nov 06, 2026
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: denying 2 Petitioner's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order. Pursuant to General Order No. 26-05, the Court set an expedited briefing schedule for the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. It is not certain that the merits of the TRO motion can be decided before the merits of the habeas petition. Even if there is a delay that results from awarding relief to Petitioner on the merits of the petition, it would be brief. Accordingly, the Court concludes that awarding relief via a TRO is not warranted. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). For these reasons, the motion is DENIED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (RAO) (Entered: 11/06/2026)
Nov 06, 2026
2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination
Nov 06, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Nov 09, 2026
Immigration 2241 Full Consent