Western District of New York • 1:25-cv-01507

Guaman Pinguil v. Rhoney, in his official capacity as Acting ICE Deputy Field Office Director

Active

Case Information

Filed: December 31, 2025
Assigned to: Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: January 05, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jan 01, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANYWDC-5669942.), filed by Jose Lucas Guaman Pinguil. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Aisen, Aaron) (Entered: 01/01/2026)
Main Document: PETITION
#2
Jan 05, 2026
TEXT ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Lucas Guaman Pinguil. To maintain the status quo, and solely so that the Court can make an informed decision about its authority to issue relief and whether any relief that it has the power to issue should be granted, the respondents are temporarily enjoined from removing the petitioner from the United States. Additionally, so that the petitioner can fully participate in these proceedings and maintain adequate access to legal counsel, the respondents also are enjoined from transferring the petitioner to any district outside the Western District of New York. See Perez y Perez v. Noem, 2025 WL 1908284, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 13, 2025) (collecting cases). On November 4, 2025, this Court issued a decision and order in Alvarez Ortiz v. Freden, case number 25-cv-960, finding that noncitizens who are present in the United States without having been admitted or paroled are not subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) but instead are subject to detention under section 1226. See Alvarez Ortiz v. Freden, --- F.Supp.3d ---, 2025 WL 3085032 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2025). The Court further held "that constitutional due process requires the government to bear the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the individual is either a danger to the community or a flight risk even at an initial bond hearing under section 1226(a)." Id. at *12. Accordingly, the respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before 1/12/2026, why, in light of that decision, (1) the petition in this case should not be granted, and (2) the Court should not order that the petitioner receive a bond hearing at which the government bears the burden to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner is a danger to the community or a flight risk and at which the immigration judge must consider non-bond alternatives to detention or, if setting a bond, the petitioner's ability to pay. SO ORDERED. Issued by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 1/5/2026. (RFI) (Entered: 01/05/2026)
Jan 05, 2026
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (DDS)
Jan 05, 2026
Case assigned to Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo. Notification to chambers of online civil opening. (DDS)