District of Colorado • 1:25-cv-04210

#1

Dec 30, 2025

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10738352)Attorney Richard M. Lynch added to party Juan Izquierdo Navarro(pty:pet), filed by Juan Izquierdo Navarro. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Entry of Appearance, # 3 Exhibit CAT Grant by IJ, # 4 Exhibit Order of Supervision, # 5 Exhibit Emails to DHS ICE, # 6 Exhibit Birth Certificates of Children)(Lynch, Richard) (Entered: 12/30/2025)

#2

Dec 30, 2025

Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) (Entered: 12/31/2025)

#3

Dec 30, 2025

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) (Entered: 12/31/2025)

#4

Jan 05, 2026

Order

#5

Jan 07, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service by Petitioner Juan Izquierdo Navarro. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt USPS Receipt)(Lynch, Richard) (Entered: 01/07/2026)

#6

Jan 13, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Alexandra J. Berger on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Johnny Choate, Kristi Noem, Ernesto SantacruzAttorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Pamela Bondi(pty:dft), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Johnny Choate(pty:dft), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Kristi Noem(pty:dft), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Ernesto Santacruz(pty:dft) (Berger, Alexandra) (Entered: 01/13/2026)

#7

Jan 15, 2026

Extension of Time

#8

Jan 15, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Respondents' 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.As Respondents acknowledge, the Court's 4 Order required that Respondents shall respond to the 1 Petition and show cause why the Petition shall not be granted within seven days of service. See [Doc. 7 at 1]. Respondents were served on January 7, 2026. [Id.]; see [Doc. 5]. Accordingly, Respondents' response was due January 14, 2026, not January 15, 2026 as Respondents contend.Because the deadline for timely filing a motion for extension of time had already expired before Respondents filed their 7 Motion, the proper standard to determine whether an extension is justified is excusable neglect rather than good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B); see also Weil v. Carecore Nat., LLC, No. 10-cv-00799-CMA-CBS, 2011 WL 1938196, at *2 (D. Colo. May 19, 2011). Press of business generally does not constitute good cause or excusable neglect. Further, Respondents concede that they knew, as of January 13, 2026, that Petitioner opposed any extension of time for Respondents to file their response. See [Doc. 7 at paragraph 9].Respondents may have until January 16, 2026 to respond to the 1 Petition and show cause why the Petition shall not be granted. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/15/2026. Text Only Entry(nywlc10, ) (Entered: 01/15/2026)

Jan 15, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

#9

Jan 16, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Rose Lake on behalf of Pamela Bondi, Johnny Choate, Kristi Noem, Ernesto SantacruzAttorney Jennifer Rose Lake added to party Pamela Bondi(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer Rose Lake added to party Johnny Choate(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer Rose Lake added to party Kristi Noem(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer Rose Lake added to party Ernesto Santacruz(pty:dft) (Lake, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/16/2026)

#10

Jan 16, 2026

RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause by Defendants Pamela Bondi, Johnny Choate, Kristi Noem, Ernesto Santacruz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Decl. of Gary Zolock)(Lake, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/16/2026)

#12

Feb 18, 2026

Order

Feb 23, 2026

Minute Order