Terminated
Case Information
Filed: December 26, 2025
Assigned to:
Brian E. Murphy
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terminated: January 06, 2026
Last Activity:
January 06, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Dec 26, 2025
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11441441 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Wilder Durango Quintero. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, # 2 Category Form CF)(Herrero, Johanna) (Entered: 12/26/2025)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Dec 29, 2025
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (CM) (Entered: 12/29/2025)
#3
Dec 29, 2025
General Order 19-02
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
#4
Dec 29, 2025
Service Order-2241 Petition
Main Document:
Service Order-2241 Petition
#5
Dec 29, 2025
Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), mailed to all respondents and emailed AUSA Duty Attorney on 12/29/2025. (MBM) (Entered: 12/29/2025)
Dec 29, 2025
Copy Mailed
Dec 29, 2025
Notice of Case Assignment
#6
Jan 05, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#7
Jan 05, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#8
Jan 05, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#9
Jan 06, 2026
Response - not related to a motion
Main Document:
Response - not related to a motion
#10
Jan 06, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. “Respondents acknowledge that, should the Court follow its reasoning in [Rincon v. Hyde, No. 25-12633-BEM, 2025 WL 3122784 (D. Mass. Nov. 7, 2025) and Tenemasa-Lema v. Hyde, No. 25-13029-BEM, 2025 WL 3280555 (D. Mass. Nov. 25, 2025)], the Court would likely find that... Petitioner’s detention without a bond hearing violates his due process rights.” Dkt. 8 at 2. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in those cases, the Court will GRANT this Petition in part and order that Petitioner receive a constitutionally adequate bond hearing to consider the merits of his release. (MBM) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
#11
Jan 06, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Jan 06, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney