District of New Hampshire • 1:26-cv-00893

#1

Oct 15, 2026

NEW CASE/PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2241/2254. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANHDC-2874437.) filed by Margarida Bernardo Andre Manuel. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ladebush, Branden) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#2

Oct 15, 2026

Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Margarida Bernardo Andre Manuel.Follow up on Objection on 10/29/2026. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Ladebush, Branden) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

#3

Oct 15, 2026

ORDER ENTERED: The Court requires sufficient time to consider the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Consequently, the respondents shall not remove or transfer the petitioner outside of the District of New Hampshire unless they provide this Court with notice at least seventy-two hours in advance of any such removal or transfer. At least twenty-four of the seventy-two hours must fall on a day during which the court is in session. Such notice shall: 1. be filed in writing on the docket of this proceeding; 2. state the reason for the necessity of such action; and 3. state why the move should not be stayed pending further court proceedings. Notice of a petitioner's release from custody may be provided after the fact. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jmb) (Entered: 10/15/2026)

Oct 15, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Landya B. McCafferty and US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc. The case designation is: 1:26-cv-893-LM-TSM. Please show this number with the judge designation on all future pleadings. (jmb)

Oct 15, 2026

NOTICE of Filing - Case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. A copy of the petition has been electronically sent via ECF to your office. No further action is required by the United States Attorney unless directed by the presiding judge.(jmb)

Oct 15, 2026

Notice - ECF

Oct 15, 2026

Notice of Filing to USA - 2255/2241

Oct 15, 2026

NOTICE. This case has been designated for Electronic Case Filing. All further submissions shall be filed in compliance with the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Pro se litigants are not required to file electronically and may continue to file documents in paper format. Persons filing electronically are strongly encouraged to complete the interactive training modules available on the courts website. To access these modules, click HERE. (jmb)

Oct 15, 2026

Case Assigned

#4

Oct 16, 2026

ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service. The Federal Respondents are ORDERED to file a response to the Petition (Doc. No. 1) no later than 12:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 17, 2026, notifying this court whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana. The Federal Respondents are further ORDERED to show cause, no later than 12:00 p.m. on Monday, October 19, 2026, why the court should not grant the Petition. So Ordered by US Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc.(de) (Entered: 10/16/2026)

Oct 16, 2026

Clerk Service

Oct 16, 2026

SERVICE BY CLERK: Copies mailed and delivered to Respondents per 4 Order Directing Service.(de)

#5

Oct 17, 2026

Extend Time to Object/Respond

#6

Oct 19, 2026

Attorney Appearance

Oct 20, 2026

Order on Motion to Extend Time to Object/Respond

#7

Oct 23, 2026

Notice - Other

#8

Oct 26, 2026

Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Margarida Bernardo Andre Manuel.Follow up on Objection on 11/9/2026. The court only follow up date DOES NOT include 3 additional days that may apply per FRCP 6(d) and FRCrP 45(c).(Ladebush, Branden) (Entered: 10/26/2026)

Oct 27, 2026

Endorsed Order - not on motion

Oct 27, 2026

ENDORSED ORDER re: 7 Notice, 8 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Text of Order: "The district court... has inherent authority to protect its proceedings, and to accord all the relief necessary to correct... particular injustices." Ozturk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382, 394 (2nd Cir. 2025) (quotations, brackets, and citation omitted). Petitioner has a right to counsel, and respondents' proposed transfer to an unknown detention center outside of New England following any denial of bond but before the court's resolution of this habeas petition would meaningfully interfere with that right. Lahamendu v. Bondi, No. 2:25-CV-02155-LK-SKV, 2025 WL 3066437, at *5 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 3, 2025). Though the court will retain jurisdiction over this petition notwithstanding petitioner's transfer, continued jurisdiction does not on its own guarantee the integrity of the habeas corpus proceeding. Id. There is a lack of adequate assurance in the record that petitioner would have a meaningful opportunity to confer with her counsel before such a transfer, and that counsel would be able to locate his client or adequately communicate with her after. Accordingly, respondents shall not remove or transfer the petitioner outside of the District of New Hampshire for seven (7) calendar days following any denial of bond by the Immigration Judge at the hearing currently scheduled for October 27, 2026. If petitioner is granted bond at that hearing, this order will be moot. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(de)