Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-08347

(HC) Ramirez de Paz v. Warden of the California City Detention Center

Completed

Case Information

Filed: October 13, 2026
Assigned to: Micah Wj Smith
Referred to: —
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: October 16, 2026
Last Activity: October 23, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Oct 13, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden of the California City Detention Center by Sergio Danilo Ramirez de Paz. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 10/14/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oct 13, 2026
RECEIPT number 100010005 for $5.00 for Sergio Danilo Ramirez de Paz from Cal City Immigration Processing. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
#2
Oct 14, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 10/14/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents for Visiting Judge
#3
Oct 14, 2026
EO: The court has received and reviewed Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 1 . The court intends to rule on the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."). On or before October 16, 2026, Respondent is ORDERED to answer in writing the following questions: 1. Is Petitioner subject to a final order of removal? If so, after being ordered removed, was Petitioner released under an order of supervision or otherwise released from custody by immigration authorities? If Petitioner was released, are there any factual or legal bases to distinguish this case from cases like Afshin A.N. v. Chestnut, No. CV 1:26-cv-03813-MWJS, 2026 WL 1726781 (E.D. Cal. June 15, 2026)?2. In Respondent's view, is Petitioner subject to mandatory detention pursuant to any provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act other than 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)? If the answer is yes, what is the relevant detention authority and why does Respondent think that it applies to Petitioner?3. Other than the circumstances covered by the first question, was Petitioner otherwise ever detained and released by immigration authorities? If the answer is yes, what were the circumstances of that release, and are there any factual or legal bases to distinguish this case from the many prior cases in which other petitioners in a variety of circumstances have been granted immediate release? See, e.g., Maxo Ben G. v. Warden of Mesa Verde Det. Facility, No. 1:26-cv-03776-MWJS, 2026 WL 1457554 (E.D. Cal. May 21, 2026); Kallebe C.L. v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-03651-MWJS, 2026 WL 1374754 (E.D. Cal. May 14, 2026); A.J.S.M.P. v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-03163-MWJS, 2026 WL 1190220 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2026); Sergio D.L.S. v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-02821-MWJS, 2026 WL 1049713 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2026). 4. If Petitioner was not previously detained and released by immigration authorities, are there any factual or legal bases to distinguish this case from the many prior cases in which other petitioners have been granted bond hearings? See, e.g., Juana G.R.P. v. Warden of the Cal. City Det. Facility, No. 1:26-cv-04406-MWJS, 2026 WL 1712375 (E.D. Cal. June 12, 2026); Bertoldo B.F. v. Warden, Cal. City Immigr. Processing Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-03634-MWJS, 2026 WL 1638322 (E.D. Cal. June 4, 2026)?5. Was Petitioner previously granted a bond hearing before an immigration judge? If the answer is yes, when was that hearing held, what was the outcome, and what was the reasoning underlying the immigration judge's decision? 6. Petitioner may file a reply on or before October 20, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. Given the court's ongoing consideration of the petition, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that Respondent shall not transfer or otherwise take Petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE MICAH W. J. SMITH) (ab) (Entered: 10/14/2026)
Oct 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents served on Sergio Danilo Ramirez de Paz. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
Oct 14, 2026
Minute Order
Oct 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: A copy of Dkt. No. 3 Entering Order, was served on Sergio Danilo Ramirez de Paz. (Deputy Clerk AB)
Oct 14, 2026
Service by Mail
#4
Oct 15, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden of the California City Detention Center (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/15/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
Oct 16, 2026
RESPONSE by Warden of the California City Detention Center to 3 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document: RESPONSE
#6
Oct 16, 2026
ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN PART signed by District Judge Micah W. J. Smith on 10/16/2026. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AB) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document: Memorandum, Opinion & Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#7
Oct 16, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *10/16/2026* pursuant to Dkt. No. 6 Order signed by District Judge Micah W. J. Smith on 10/16/2026. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AB) (Entered: 10/16/2026)
Main Document: Judgment
Oct 16, 2026
Service by Mail
Oct 16, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: A copy of Dkt. No. 6 Order, and Dkt. No. 7 Judgment, served on Sergio Danilo Ramirez de Paz. (Deputy Clerk AB)
#8
Oct 23, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Warden of the California City Detention Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit IJ ORDER)(Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/23/2026)
Main Document: STATUS