District of New Mexico • 2:26-cv-03362

Adekola-Kunle v. Blanche

Active

Case Information

Filed: October 07, 2026
Assigned to: Margaret I. Strickland
Referred to: Damian L. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity: October 07, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Oct 07, 2026
PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Jim Adekola-Kunle. (eh) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Main Document: Petition for 2241 Relief
#2
Oct 07, 2026
NOTICE: In accordance with the Standing Order, filed January 28, 2026 in 26-MC-00004-03 (Doc. 3), the Clerk of Court provides notice of completion of electronic service. A copy of the petition in this matter was provided to all federal respondents by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. The parties should review the Standing Order, and any further Orders entered in this matter regarding the deadline to respond to the petition. (eh)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (Entered: 10/07/2026)
#3
Oct 07, 2026
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by District Judge Margaret I. Strickland: The Court ORDERS Petitioner to show cause why his Petition should not be summarily dismissed without prejudice because it does not state a claim under which habeas relief can be granted. Petitioner alleges he was detained on or about June 1, 2026. An Order of Removal was entered on August 25, 2008, and Petitioner did not appeal that Order, making it administratively final. See 8 U.S.C. § 1241.1(a). Where, as here, the petitioner is subject to a final order of removal, detention is governed by Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 682 (2001) and 8 U.S.C. § 1231. The Supreme Court determined that a six-month detention period is presumptively reasonable. Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 701. Because Petitioner is subject to a final removal order and has not yet been detained for six months, it appears that he is lawfully detained. Accordingly, Petitioner shall have 21 days from the date of this Order to SHOW CAUSE why the Petition should not be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner is reminded that this Court cannot allow noncitizens to permanently remain in the United States or make any determination as to immigration status. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, known as the "zipper clause," Federal District Courts lack jurisdiction over claims challenging removal orders. Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 316-17 (2018). [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] Show Cause Response due by 10/28/2026. (pa) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
#4
Oct 07, 2026
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 1012285 (nnd)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Oct 07, 2026
Filing Fee Received
Oct 07, 2026
United States District Judge Margaret I. Strickland and United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez assigned. (eh)
Oct 07, 2026
Order to Show Cause

Parties

Adekola-Kunle
Party
Blanche
Party