Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01977

#1

Dec 23, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem by PARGAT SINGH. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12698125) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Gurpreet Kaur, # 2 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit ROR)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#2

Dec 23, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by PARGAT SINGH. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Notice)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#3

Dec 23, 2025

PROPOSED ORDER re TRO re 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by PARGAT SINGH. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#4

Dec 23, 2025

NOTICE CIVIL COVER SHEET by PARGAT SINGH. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#5

Dec 23, 2025

Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider

#6

Dec 23, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/23/2025: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 12/29/2025. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 12/30/2025. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the petition and motion by email to the US Attorneys Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioners counsel shall do so by no later than 5:00 PM on 12/23/2025. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#7

Dec 23, 2025

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Pargat Singh re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

Dec 23, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#8

Dec 29, 2025

OPPOSITION by Respondents Tonya Andrews, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem to 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Attorney Khan, Zulkar added. (Khan, Zulkar) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

#9

Dec 29, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/29/2025: In Respondents' 8 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents do not identify any provision of law or fact in this case that would substantively distinguish it from this court's decisions in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025) and Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025). Indeed, Respondents concede that this case is not substantively distinguishable. (See Doc. No. 8 at 3.) Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Labrador-Prato and Selis Tinoco, Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner Pargat Singh shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; (2) Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him, such as electronic monitoring, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing; and (3) If the Government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. Further, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than 1/5/2026, as to why this court should not issue a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms as this Order. Petitioner may file a response thereto by no later than 1/8/2026. Respondents may file a reply to Petitioner's response by no later than 1/9/2026. If the parties agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

Dec 29, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Jan 09, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#12

Jan 12, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/12/2026: The parties shall file within fourteen days of the date of this order a joint status report addressing the parties' plan to proceed with this action. The joint status report should address, at minimum, whether any motion practice is anticipated, and whether the petition is moot. (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 01/12/2026)

Jan 12, 2026

Minute Order

#13

Jan 26, 2026

PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE by All Respondents. (Khan, Zulkar) Modified on 1/30/2026 (KS). (Entered: 01/26/2026)

#14

Jan 26, 2026

PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Pargat Singh. (Kaur, Gurpreet) Modified on 1/30/2026 (KS). (Entered: 01/26/2026)

Feb 20, 2026

Minute Order

Apr 13, 2026

Findings and Recommendations

#19

Apr 21, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#20

Apr 23, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#21

Apr 23, 2026

Judgment