Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01977

#1

Dec 23, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem by PARGAT SINGH. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12698125) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Gurpreet Kaur, # 2 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit ROR)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#2

Dec 23, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by PARGAT SINGH. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Notice)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#3

Dec 23, 2025

PROPOSED ORDER re TRO re 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by PARGAT SINGH. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#4

Dec 23, 2025

NOTICE CIVIL COVER SHEET by PARGAT SINGH. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#5

Dec 23, 2025

Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider

#6

Dec 23, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/23/2025: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 12/29/2025. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 12/30/2025. If Petitioner has not already served a copy of the petition and motion by email to the US Attorneys Office at their email address (usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov), Petitioners counsel shall do so by no later than 5:00 PM on 12/23/2025. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#7

Dec 23, 2025

CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Pargat Singh re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

Dec 23, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#8

Dec 29, 2025

OPPOSITION by Respondents Tonya Andrews, Pamela Bondi, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem to 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Attorney Khan, Zulkar added. (Khan, Zulkar) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

#9

Dec 29, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/29/2025: In Respondents' 8 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents do not identify any provision of law or fact in this case that would substantively distinguish it from this court's decisions in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025) and Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025). Indeed, Respondents concede that this case is not substantively distinguishable. (See Doc. No. 8 at 3.) Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Labrador-Prato and Selis Tinoco, Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner Pargat Singh shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; (2) Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him, such as electronic monitoring, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing; and (3) If the Government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. Further, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than 1/5/2026, as to why this court should not issue a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms as this Order. Petitioner may file a response thereto by no later than 1/8/2026. Respondents may file a reply to Petitioner's response by no later than 1/9/2026. If the parties agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

Dec 29, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Jan 09, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings