Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-06387

#1

Oct 05, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos.(cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#2

Oct 05, 2026

MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#3

Oct 05, 2026

EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#4

Oct 05, 2026

EMERGENCY MOTION for Stay of Removal by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#5

Oct 05, 2026

EMERGENCY MOTION for Immediate Release by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#6

Oct 05, 2026

EMERGENCY MOTION to Expedite Consideration by Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

Oct 05, 2026

Case has been randomly assigned to the docket of the Honorable Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (cih)

Oct 05, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (cih)

#7

Oct 06, 2026

Case Opening Letter mailed to Jose Omar Ramirez Ramos. (cih) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#8

Oct 06, 2026

TEXT ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) the Government's claimed statutory authority for detaining Petitioner (e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), § 1231); (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. Additionally, if this case turns on whether Petitioner's detention without a bond hearing violates the due process rights afforded to noncitizens who have established a substantial presence in the United States, Respondents must consider the Court's prior orders addressing this question and note any material factual differences between those cases and this one. E.g., Valencia Reyes v. Noem, No. SA-25-CV-1921-XR, 2026 WL 981034 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2026); Gonzalez Carrillo v. Bondi, No. SA-26-CV-778-XR, 2026 WL 981037 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026). If Respondents so choose, in lieu of a full response, they may instead file a response indicating that there are no material factual differences here and preserving all legal arguments made by the Federal Respondents in those cases. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. (CKlc) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

#9

Oct 06, 2026

Text Order DENYING 3 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, 5 Motion for Immediate Release, and 6 Motion for Expedited Consideration entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. This Court has received hundreds of habeas corpus petitions in recent months. This Petition will be assessed, and the Court will issue a ruling, in due course.(CKlc) (Entered: 10/06/2026)

Oct 06, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

Oct 06, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Oct 06, 2026

Order on Motion to Stay

Oct 06, 2026

Order

Oct 06, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Oct 06, 2026

Text Order GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The Court may waive the initial filing fee and costs where a plaintiff submits an affidavit indicating that he or she is unable to pay these fees and costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion indicates that Plaintiff is currently detained, has no income, no assets, and no ability to pay the filing fee. The Court exercises its discretion to waive the fee. See Williams v. Estelle, 681 F.2d 946, 947 (5th Cir. 1982) (noting the Court's discretion in IFP determinations). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CKlc)

Oct 06, 2026

Text Order DENYING 4 Motion to Stay Removal entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the relief requested in Petitioner's motion. "A request for a stay of removal is a challenge to a removal order." See Imran v. Harper, No. 25-30370, 2026 WL 93131, at *1 (5th Cir. Jan. 13, 2026). District courts generally "lack[] jurisdiction to grant such relief." Id. Federal courts lack jurisdiction over "claims connected directly and immediately with a 'decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders.'" Humphries v. Various Fed. USINS Emps., 164 F.3d 936, 943 (5th Cir. 1999) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g)). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CKlc)