Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:25-cv-00551

#1

Dec 22, 2025

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt Number: ), filed by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#2

Dec 22, 2025

EXHIBITS in Support of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2) (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#3

Dec 22, 2025

MOTION for Order to Show Cause, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. Motion(s) referred to Keith A. Pesto. (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

Dec 22, 2025

Judge Stephanie L. Haines and Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added. (cel)

#4

Dec 23, 2025

Because Petitioners request for relief goes beyond the "limited nature of a TRO" and instead requests "mandatory, affirmative relief-indeed, the ultimate relief sought by [Petitioner] in [his] underlying habeas petition[,]" Hope v. Warden York County Prison, 956 F.3d 156, 162 (3d Cir. 2020); ECF No. 1, p. 36, the Court will DENY Petitioners Motion in so much as it requests relief via a T.R.O. However, the Court will consider Petitioners claims in so much as he seeks a P.I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service is directed to execute, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, service of this Order, by certified mail, together with a copy of Petitioners Motion at ECF No. 3 upon the Respondent, Warden of Moshannon Valley Processing Center. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the seriousness of the relief sought, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Respondents shall file and serve a written response to Petitioners Motion, ECF No. 3, no later than seven (7) days from the date on which service of Petitioners Motion, ECF No. 3, is effectuated. Aside from any additional arguments Respondents wish to make, the Response shall specifically address: (1) what statute governs Petitioners detention and why, (2) the status of Petitioners immigration proceedings following his December 22, 2025, hearing, and (3) if Petitioner is being detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), why this Courts decision in Calzado Diaz v. Noem, No. 3:25-cv-458, 2025 WL 3628480 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2025) should not be applied to the instant case. Petitioner may, but is not required to, file and serve a Reply to any Response submitted by Respondents. Should Petitioner choose to file a Reply, he shall file said Reply no later than three (3) days from the date on which Respondents file and serve their Response.. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 12/23/25. (ljk) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#5

Dec 23, 2025

Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 300000869 (keh) (Entered: 12/23/2025)