Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:25-cv-00551

#1

Dec 22, 2025

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt Number: ), filed by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#2

Dec 22, 2025

EXHIBITS in Support of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2) (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#3

Dec 22, 2025

MOTION for Order to Show Cause, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. Motion(s) referred to Keith A. Pesto. (cel) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

Dec 22, 2025

Judge Stephanie L. Haines and Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added. (cel)

#4

Dec 23, 2025

Because Petitioners request for relief goes beyond the "limited nature of a TRO" and instead requests "mandatory, affirmative relief-indeed, the ultimate relief sought by [Petitioner] in [his] underlying habeas petition[,]" Hope v. Warden York County Prison, 956 F.3d 156, 162 (3d Cir. 2020); ECF No. 1, p. 36, the Court will DENY Petitioners Motion in so much as it requests relief via a T.R.O. However, the Court will consider Petitioners claims in so much as he seeks a P.I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service is directed to execute, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, service of this Order, by certified mail, together with a copy of Petitioners Motion at ECF No. 3 upon the Respondent, Warden of Moshannon Valley Processing Center. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the seriousness of the relief sought, and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Respondents shall file and serve a written response to Petitioners Motion, ECF No. 3, no later than seven (7) days from the date on which service of Petitioners Motion, ECF No. 3, is effectuated. Aside from any additional arguments Respondents wish to make, the Response shall specifically address: (1) what statute governs Petitioners detention and why, (2) the status of Petitioners immigration proceedings following his December 22, 2025, hearing, and (3) if Petitioner is being detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), why this Courts decision in Calzado Diaz v. Noem, No. 3:25-cv-458, 2025 WL 3628480 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2025) should not be applied to the instant case. Petitioner may, but is not required to, file and serve a Reply to any Response submitted by Respondents. Should Petitioner choose to file a Reply, he shall file said Reply no later than three (3) days from the date on which Respondents file and serve their Response.. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 12/23/25. (ljk) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#5

Dec 23, 2025

Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 300000869 (keh) (Entered: 12/23/2025)

#6

Jan 07, 2026

Proposed Order re 3 Motion for Order to Show Cause, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion for TRO by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (keh) (Entered: 01/07/2026)

#7

Jan 07, 2026

AFFIDAVIT re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (keh) (Entered: 01/07/2026)

#8

Jan 14, 2026

Order

#9

Jan 22, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Leo Ivory on behalf of PAMELA BONDI, MARCOS CHARLES, TODD LYONS, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO, JOHN TSOUKARIS. (Ivory, Michael) (Entered: 01/22/2026)

#10

Jan 22, 2026

CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by PAMELA BONDI, MARCOS CHARLES, TODD LYONS, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO, JOHN TSOUKARIS. (Ivory, Michael) (Entered: 01/22/2026)

#11

Jan 28, 2026

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to 3 Motion for Order to Show Cause, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion for TRO, filed by PAMELA BONDI, MARCOS CHARLES, TODD LYONS, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO, JOHN TSOUKARIS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4) (Ivory, Michael) (Entered: 01/28/2026)

#12

Feb 06, 2026

RESPONSE to 11 Response in Opposition filed by ENDY DANERY MATEO CARBAJAL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (keh) (Entered: 02/10/2026)

#13

Feb 11, 2026

ORDER. Petitioner is a native and citizen of Guatemala. On or about October 19, 2016, he and his mother illegally entered the United States near Saint Luis, Arizona. Shortly thereafter, they encountered members of the Border Patrol. Both were served notices to appear, but in June 2023, the immigration case was administratively closed. Petitioner settled in Delaware. On October 6, 2025, the Delaware State Police charged Petitioner with the following crimes: burglary; offensive touching; and criminal mischief. The following day, ICE agents interviewed Petitioner at the Sussex Correctional Center in Georgetown, Delaware. He was taken into ICE custody following his release from the Sussex Correctional Center. The Court finds Petitioner is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. Section 1226(c). In his Habeas Petition 1 Petitioner seeks release from custody. Pursuant to German Santos v. Warden Pike County Correctional Facility, 965 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2020). "Because his detention has grown unreasonable, the Government must hold a bond hearing. To justify his continued detention, it must show, by clear and convincing evidence, that German Santos would likely flee or pose a danger to the community if released. If it cannot, it must release him." Id. at 214. "The evidence must be individualized and support a finding that continued detention is needed to prevent [Petitioner] from fleeing or harming the community." Id. at 214. Petitioner has not been detained for an unreasonable period of time. The Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) held that after a six-month period of presumptively reasonable detention, the alien may "provide[] good reason to believe that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future," after which the Government "must respond with evidence sufficient to rebut that showing." Id. at 701. The Preliminary Injunction is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The jurisdiction of this case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 2/11/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cag) (Entered: 02/11/2026)

Feb 11, 2026

Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction AND Order on Motion to Show Cause