Active
Case Information
Filed: October 02, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
October 08, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Oct 02, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Gerald Moss, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella by Nasib Abrar Abir. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13961312) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Oct 02, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Nasib Abrar Abir. (Attachments: # 1 Notice, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Oct 02, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Oct 02, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for Gerald Moss,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin,Anthony Andrews for David J. Venturella (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Oct 02, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/2/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Noncitizens admitted to the United States pursuant to a visa are subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) if they "overstay or violate the terms of their visa[]" or lawful nonimmigrant status. See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1167 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). Further, this court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the Petition. See e.g., Oliveira Tinoco v. Albarran, No. 1:26-cv-05505-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 2942919 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2026); Kaur v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-05349-DC-CSK, 2026 WL 2790742, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2026); Zhou v. Warden, Cal. City Immigr. Processing Ctr., No. 1:26-cv-05774-DC-CSK, 2026 WL 2825584, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 21, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 10/6/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Oliveira Tinoco, Kaur, and Zhou. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 10/7/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
Oct 02, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#8
Oct 08, 2026
ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 10/7/2026 GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Petitioner Nasib Abrar Abir (A No. 202-042-970) shall be RELEASED IMMEDIATELY from Responde nts' custody with the same conditions he was subject to immediately prior to his detention in August 2026. Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custo dy hearing. Respondents shall RETURN all of Petitioner's documents and possessions upon his release from custody. Within 3 days from the date of entry of this order, Respondents shall FILE a notice of compliance confirming that Petitioner has be en released. If the government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must b e considered. This order does not address the circumstances in which Respondents may detain Petitioner in the event Petitioner becomes subject to an executable final order of removal and Petitioner receives notice of that final order of removal. CASE CLOSED. (cc: ICE-Central Valley Annex) (Deputy Clerk HAH)
#9
Oct 08, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Parties
(HC) Abir
Party
Moss
Party