Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-06264

#1

Sep 28, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 13098), filed by Agustina Lopez Santiago. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt, # 2 Copy of Envelope)(rqr) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

Sep 28, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION to Expedite, MOTION Immediate release located in 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Agustina Lopez Santiago. (rqr)

Sep 28, 2026

This case has been randomly assigned to Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rqr)

Sep 28, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (rqr)

#2

Sep 30, 2026

Case Opening Letter mailed to Agustina Lopez Santiago. (rqr) (Entered: 09/30/2026)

Sep 30, 2026

Remark (No Doc#)

Sep 30, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

#3

Oct 01, 2026

ORDER FOR SERVICE. Upon review, it is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing (NEF) of the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents, as required by the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is further ORDERED that Respondents must file a response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) within 7 days of electronic service. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days thereafter.. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (rqr) (Entered: 10/01/2026)

Oct 01, 2026

Text Order DENYING [] Motion to Expedite. Prompt resolution is already contemplated by the nature of the writ of habeas corpus itself. See Harris v. Nelson, 394 U.S. 286, 291 (1969); see also 28 U.S.C. §2243. The Court will rule on the Petition in due course. Entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vc)

Oct 01, 2026

Expedite AND Miscellaneous Relief AND Temporary Restraining Order

Oct 01, 2026

Order on Motion to Expedite

Oct 01, 2026

Text Order DENYING [] Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Because the injunctive relief Petitioner now seeks on a preliminary and ex parte basis is identical to the ultimate relief sought on the merits of this already-expedited habeas proceeding, the Motion is DENIED. The Court will resolve Petitioners request for relief by promptly ruling on the merits of the writ itself. See Garcia-Aleman v. Thompson, No. 25-CV-886-OLG, Dkt. No. 20 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2025) (collecting cases). Entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vc)

Oct 01, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#4

Oct 08, 2026

Response