Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07838

#1

Sep 24, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Golden State Annex ICE Detention Facility by Xa Lee. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#2

Sep 24, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Xa Lee. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#3

Sep 24, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Xa Lee. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#4

Sep 24, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Xa Lee. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#5

Sep 25, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#6

Sep 25, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Warden, Golden State Annex ICE Detention Facility (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

#7

Sep 25, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/25/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject to discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, 183 F.4th 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). This court has previously addressed claims where noncitizens were re-detained after being released from immigration custody (see, e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026)), and where noncitizens were detained by immigration authorities to facilitate removal pursuant to a removal order (see, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025); Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025)). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 9/29/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the cases referenced. Petitioner may file a Reply by 10/13/2026. Finally, the court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition. See A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Both parties shall address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 09/25/2026)

Sep 25, 2026

Service by Mail

Sep 25, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Xa Lee. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

Sep 25, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

Sep 25, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Xa Lee. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)

Sep 30, 2026

Minute Order

Sep 30, 2026

Service by Mail

Sep 30, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

#12

Oct 01, 2026

Notice of Related Case

Oct 01, 2026

Minute Order

Oct 01, 2026

Service by Mail

#15

Oct 07, 2026

Notice (Other)

Oct 09, 2026

Service by Mail

Oct 09, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis