Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01943
(HC) Artemenko v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Active
Case Information
Filed: December 19, 2025
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
February 25, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Dec 19, 2025
(2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, Todd M. Lyons by Sergey Artemenko. Receipt Number 100006730 for the filing fee in the amount of $5.00 paid on 12/19/2025 by Sergey Artemenko. (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 12/19/2025)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Dec 19, 2025
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/23/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 12/19/2025)
Main Document:
Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider
Dec 19, 2025
SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Sergey Artemenko. (Deputy Clerk CRM)
Dec 19, 2025
Service by Mail
#3
Dec 23, 2025
Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Dec 23, 2025
Service by Mail
Dec 23, 2025
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Order served on Sergey Artemenko. (Deputy Clerk KS)
#4
Dec 29, 2025
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Zachary Malinski, GOVT for All Respondents. (Malinski, Zachary) Modified on 1/16/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 12/29/2025)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Dec 29, 2025
RESPONSE to 3 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, OPPOSITION to Request for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, and RETURN to 1 Petition by All Respondents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Malinski, Zachary) Modified on 1/16/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 12/29/2025)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#7
Dec 29, 2025
EXHIBIT G in support of 1 Petition for Writ Habeas Corpus by Sergey Artemenko. (Deputy Clerk VLC) Modified on 1/5/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 12/31/2025)
Main Document:
EXHIBIT
#6
Dec 30, 2025
Appoint Counsel
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
#8
Jan 05, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 01/06/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
#9
Jan 30, 2026
DECLARATION of Sergey Artemenko re citizenship. (Deputy Clerk RRB) (Entered: 02/02/2026)
Main Document:
DECLARATION
#10
Feb 06, 2026
REQUEST FOR STATUS by Sergey Artemenko. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 02/09/2026)
Main Document:
REQUEST
#11
Feb 17, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#12
Feb 17, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#13
Feb 18, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/18/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 11 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the courts express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 11 motion for temporary restraining order. No later than tomorrow, 2/19/2026, by 5:00 PM, respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 11 motion for temporary restraining order. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Uzzhina v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01594-DAD-SCR, 2025 WL 3458787 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), Arshakyam v. Warden of California City Det., No. 1:25-cv-01780-DAD-AC (HC), 2026 WL 143143 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Furthermore, respondents are directed to indicate in their opposition whether they oppose converting the motion for temporary restraining order into a motion for preliminary injunction. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Deputy Clerk JRM) (Entered: 02/18/2026)
Feb 18, 2026
Minute Order
#14
Feb 19, 2026
SUPPLEMENTARY OPPOSITION to Preliminary Injunctive Relief by Respondents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Malinski, Zachary) Modified on 2/24/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 02/19/2026)
Main Document:
SUPPLEMENTARY
Parties
(HC) Artemenko
Party
Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Party