Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01950

#1

Dec 19, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Christopher Chestnut by Mariluz Ticllacuri Nateros. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12691646) (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

#2

Dec 19, 2025

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Mariluz Ticllacuri Nateros. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

#3

Dec 19, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Mariluz Ticllacuri Nateros. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

#4

Dec 19, 2025

ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/23/2026. (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

#5

Dec 22, 2025

Certificate / Proof of Service

#6

Dec 22, 2025

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1 ) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 3 ). Based on the record filed thus far, it appears Petitioner is likely to succeed on the due process claim and that some form of immediate relief may be appropriate. Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, Respondents are ordered to show cause in writing no later than December 30, 2025 why the Court should not grant Petitioners motion for a temporary restraining order. Any response SHALL provide the Court with copies of referenced/relevant portions of Petitioners A-File and other supporting documents, including available documentation related to any asserted violations of release conditions. In addition, Respondents SHALL address the following issues: (1) why this case is distinguishable from the numerous decisions issued by the undersigned granting injunctive relief in similar circumstances; and (2) why the facts suggest a change in circumstance material to the issue of whether Petitioner is a danger to public safety or a flight risk.See, e.g., Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-CV-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Bernal v. Albarran, No. 25-CV-09772-RS, 2025 WL 3281422, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2025). Petitioner may file a reply no later than January 5, 2026. The Court further directs the parties to indicate on or before their respective filing deadlines (1) whether they are requesting a hearing; and (2) whether they agree to convert the request for a TRO into a preliminary injunction without further briefing. Depending on the content of the filings, the Court may set a hearing or may rule on the papers.In the meantime, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that Respondents shall not remove Petitioner from the United States nor transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the exigent circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and any subsequent order and finds that Petitioner has satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such preliminary relief.No later than December 22, 2025, to the extent not already accomplished, Petitioners counsel is directed: (1) to serve Respondents with a copy of the Petition, the motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail to all appropriate recipients including the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, with a copy to usacae.ecf2241-imm@usdoj.gov, and by overnight mail; and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on December 22, 2025. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#7

Dec 22, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 12/22/2025)

Dec 22, 2025

Minute Order

#8

Dec 30, 2025

RESPONSE to 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Pam Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem. Attorney Butland, Brodie MacLeod added. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A - E)(Butland, Brodie) (Entered: 12/30/2025)

#9

Dec 31, 2025

REPLY by Mariluz Ticllacuri Nateros re 8 Response to Order to Show Cause. (Beles, Robert) (Entered: 12/31/2025)

#10

Jan 16, 2026

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

#11

Jan 16, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#12

Jan 20, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney Robert Joseph Beles re: 11 Amended Motion for Temporary Restraining Order: Your Amended Motion for Temporary Restraining Order was filed in incorrect case. Please re-file in correct case 1:26-cv-00067-KES-SKO, Rodriguez Toma v. Chestnut, et al. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 01/20/2026)

#13

Jan 20, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#14

Jan 22, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Mar 23, 2026

Order Reassigning Case

#16

Apr 09, 2026

Findings and Recommendations