Western District of Washington • 2:26-cv-03576
Velasquez Orellana v. Hernandez
Active
Case Information
Filed: September 22, 2026
Assigned to:
Lauren King
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
October 09, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 22, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # AWAWDC-10005339) filed by Denis Alfredo Velasquez Orellana. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit)(Jacobsen, Peyton) Modified on 9/23/2026-NEF regenerated to AUSA and Immigration Habeas Service (ELS). (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 22, 2026
DECLARATION of Denis Alfredo Velasquez Orellana re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Denis Alfredo Velasquez Orellana (Jacobsen, Peyton) Modified on 9/23/2026-NEF regenerated to AUSA (ELS). (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document:
Declaration (non motion)
#3
Sep 23, 2026
SCHEDULING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED (cc: Immigration Habeas Service) Responses due by 10/7/2026, Replies due by 10/13/2026, by Judge Lauren King. (ELS) (Entered: 09/23/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration Habeas Scheduling Order
Sep 23, 2026
Add and Terminate Judges
Sep 23, 2026
Judge Lauren King added. (ELS)
#4
Sep 24, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lawrence Joel Van Daley, Sr on behalf of Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Van Daley, Lawrence) (Entered: 09/24/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#5
Oct 07, 2026
FEDERAL RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security. Noting Date 10/13/2026, (Van Daley, Lawrence) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Main Document:
Response to Habeas Petition
#6
Oct 07, 2026
DECLARATION of Lawrence Van Daley filed by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security re 5 FEDERAL RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Van Daley, Lawrence) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Main Document:
Declaration
#7
Oct 07, 2026
DECLARATION of Nhat Truong filed by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security re 5 FEDERAL RESPONDENTS' RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Van Daley, Lawrence) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Main Document:
Declaration
#8
Oct 07, 2026
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE PETITIONER ; filed by Respondents Todd Blanche, Julio Hernandez, MarkWayne Mullin, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Van Daley, Lawrence) (Entered: 10/07/2026)
Main Document:
Notice-Other
#9
Oct 08, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed by Petitioner Denis Alfredo Velasquez Orellana. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/8/2026, (Jacobsen, Peyton) (Entered: 10/08/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#10
Oct 08, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (text only): The Court DENIES Petitioner's 9 motion for a temporary restraining order. Petitioner does not dispute, see Dkt. No. 9 at 3, that his current detention authority has shifted to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a) because he has not appealed the BIA's 9/30/2026 dismissal of his appeal of his removal order. Petitioner does not address whether he intends to appeal the BIA's order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(1)(B) (the removal period begins on "the latest of," as relevant here, (1) the date the order of removal becomes administratively final, or (2) if the removal order "is judicially reviewed and if a court orders a stay of the removal of the alien, the date of the court's final order"). Absent an appeal (and a stay of removal pending appeal, see 9th Cir. Gen. Order 6.4(c)), Petitioner is in the removal period and his detention is mandatory, which moots his petition. See Fernandez v. Scott, No. 2:26-CV-00043-LK, 2026 WL 607761, at *3 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 4, 2026). However, given the recency of the BIA order and the fact that Petitioner has not addressed whether he intends to appeal, the Court ORDERS that Respondents are prohibited from removing Petitioner until 10/9/2026 at 10:00 a.m. to provide Petitioner's counsel sufficient time to confer with Petitioner regarding a potential appeal and file an amended TRO if necessary, and to maintain the status quo during such period of time. Authorized by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) (Entered: 10/08/2026)
#11
Oct 08, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#12
Oct 08, 2026
Declaration (non motion)
Main Document:
Declaration (non motion)
#14
Oct 08, 2026
Response to Motion
Main Document:
Response to Motion
Oct 08, 2026
2 - Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
Oct 08, 2026
Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Oct 09, 2026
Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney