Active
Case Information
Filed: September 21, 2026
Assigned to:
Madeline Cox Arleo
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
November 02, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 21, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17969064.), filed by Frantzie DORSAINVIL. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CONDE-HERNANDEZ, MARISOL) (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 21, 2026
ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 9/21/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document:
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
Sep 21, 2026
Judge Madeline Cox Arleo added. (jml, )
Sep 21, 2026
Add and Terminate Judges
#3
Sep 22, 2026
Certification of Petitioner's Counsel on behalf of FRANTZIE DORSAINVIL Re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (CONDE-HERNANDEZ, MARISOL) (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document:
Certification
#4
Sep 23, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#5
Sep 25, 2026
Letter
Main Document:
Letter
#6
Oct 08, 2026
Letter from Petitioner Challenging Constitutionality of Bond Hearing. (CONDE-HERNANDEZ, MARISOL) (Entered: 10/08/2026)
Main Document:
Letter
#7
Oct 08, 2026
Letter from Thomas Coghlan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(COGHLAN, THOMAS) (Entered: 10/08/2026)
Main Document:
Letter
#8
Oct 09, 2026
TEXT ORDER- Respondents' request to close the case (ECF No. 7) is denied without prejudice, as Petitioner has filed a letter challenging the constitutionality of his bond hearing (ECF No. 6) and alleges that his re-detention following release on recognizance is unlawful. (ECF No. 1.) Within 14 days, Petitioner's counsel may file a motion challenging the bond proceeding, accompanied by the bond hearing transcript. Respondents shall file a letter response to that motion within 7 days of the same. In their response, Respondents' shall also address Petitioner's claim that his re-detention following release on an order of recognizance is unlawful. Petitioner also appears to argue that he should have been released pursuant to this Court's self-executing order based on his lack of criminal history; however, the self-executing order required release of non-criminal detainees who are subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) only if the notice of custody determination had not been issued by the time he filed a habeas petition. Here, that notice was issued on September 16, 2026, prior to the filing of the Petition, and relief on that basis is denied.. So Ordered by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 10/9/2026. (aa, ) (Entered: 10/09/2026)
Oct 09, 2026
Order
#9
Oct 28, 2026
Letter
Main Document:
Letter
#10
Oct 30, 2026
Letter
Main Document:
Letter
#11
Nov 02, 2026
Letter
Main Document:
Letter
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm