District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-04639

#1

Sep 21, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11302852)Attorney Miriam Rose Miller added to party Luis Alverto Rodriguez Reyna(pty:pet), filed by Luis Alverto Rodriguez Reyna. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - T Visa Submission, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B - I765 Receipt Notice, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C - USCIS Warning to Alien Ordered Removed, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 09/21/2026)

#2

Sep 21, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

#3

Sep 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner Luis Alverto Rodriguez Reyna's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1, in which Petitioner requests immediate release from immigration detention or, in the alternative, that the Court order Respondents to provide Petitioner with a "new... custody determination," id. at 15. Having reviewed the petition, the Court ORDERS Petitioner to, no later than two calendar days from the entry of this Order, (1) serve Respondents with copies of the Petition and any accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and mail pursuant to the service requirements outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i); and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Within five (5) calendar days of service, Respondents are ORDERED TO RESPOND to the Petition and are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while § 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Further, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et. al, Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Ass'n, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/22/2026. Text Only Entry (cnsja, ) (Entered: 09/22/2026)

Sep 22, 2026

Minute Order