Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-07664

(HC) Vu v. Chestnut

Active

Case Information

Filed: September 21, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity: October 12, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Sep 21, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Respondents by Van Luan Vu. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13906893) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibits)(Hanna, Mariana) Modified on 9/30/2026 (HAH). [ 1 -2 Exhibits SEALED pursuant to 10 Minute Order] Modified on 10/5/2026 (JJD). (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Sep 21, 2026
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Van Luan Vu for attorney Yaritssa Plasencia to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ACAEDC-13906944) (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Record Certificate of Good Standing) (Hanna, Mariana) (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document: Application for Pro Hac Vice and Proposed Order
#3
Sep 21, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk SSA) (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Sep 21, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Respondents. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 9/30/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 09/21/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
Sep 22, 2026
NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:26-cv-03400-DC-CSK, 1:26-cv-07664-DAD-JDP by Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Related Case
#6
Sep 22, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Respondents. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 10/2/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#7
Sep 22, 2026
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/21/26 GRANTING 2 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Yaritssa Plasencia, PHV for Van Luan Vu. The Pro Hac Vice Attorney is directed to request Pro Hac Vice access for the Eastern District of California through PACER. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 09/22/2026)
Main Document: Order on Application for Pro Hac Vice
#8
Sep 24, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 9/24/2026: Pursuant to Local Rule 123, the court finds that these actions, Case No. 1:26-cv-07664-DAD-JDP and 1:26-cv-03400-DC-CSK, are related because both cases involve overlapping parties, claims, events and/or questions of fact or law. Thus, the court ORDERS that Case No. 1:26-cv-07664-DAD-JDP is REASSIGNED to U.S. District Judge Dena M. Coggins and Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim. All future filings shall reflect the judge reassignment and use Case No. 1:26-cv-07664-DC-CSK. (Text Only Entry) (cc: DC, CSK, Operations Supervisor-Sacramento) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 09/24/2026)
Sep 24, 2026
Minute Order
#9
Oct 02, 2026
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dena M. Coggins and Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim. The new case number is 1:26-cv-7664 DC CSK (HC). (Deputy Clerk KLY) (Entered: 10/02/2026)
#10
Oct 05, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 10/5/2026: Attached as exhibits to the petition are documents containing confidential personal information regarding a non-party, including a non-party's driver's license and passport. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal all documents attached to ECF No. 1-2. Petitioner's counsel is reminded that in the future, such information must be filed under seal or redacted. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk AW) (Entered: 10/05/2026)
#11
Oct 05, 2026
MMINUTE ORDER issued by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 10/5/2026. Parties must review this MINUTE ORDER Document, which is a scheduling order. Respondents are directed to file an answer or motion to dismiss within 7 days from the date of this order. Respondents are warned that the failure to respond to the petition will be interpreted as non-opposition to granting the relief requested in the habeas petition. Petitioner's reply/traverse to an answer or opposition to a motion to dismiss, if any, is due within 7 days after being served with a copy of respondents' answer or motion to dismiss. A reply by respondents to an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within 7 days after being served with the opposition. (Deputy Clerk AW) (Entered: 10/05/2026)
Main Document: Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Oct 05, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
#12
Oct 12, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document: Dismiss