District of Massachusetts • 1:25-cv-13899

Antunez Rodriguez v. McDonald

Active

Case Information

Filed: December 18, 2025
Assigned to: Richard Gaylore Stearns
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: January 08, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Dec 18, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11428982 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Carlos Hernan Antunez Rodriguez. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pomerleau, Todd) Modified on 12/18/2025 (MC). (Entered: 12/18/2025)
Main Document: Complaint AND Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Dec 18, 2025
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. Emergency Order Concerning Stay of Transfer or Removal.(MC) (Entered: 12/18/2025)
Main Document: Order
#3
Dec 19, 2025
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (CM) (Entered: 12/19/2025)
#4
Dec 19, 2025
Order
Main Document: Order
#6
Dec 19, 2025
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
Dec 19, 2025
Copy Mailed
Dec 19, 2025
Notice of Case Assignment
#7
Dec 23, 2025
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#8
Dec 23, 2025
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Main Document: Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
Dec 24, 2025
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
#10
Jan 05, 2026
Extension of Time
Main Document: Extension of Time
#11
Jan 05, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondents' response is due January 7, 2026. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 01/05/2026)
Jan 05, 2026
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
#12
Jan 07, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#13
Jan 08, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Government purports to detain petitioner -- the subject of a final order of dismissal more than ninety days old -- pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6). In Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), the Supreme Court read an implicit limitation into § 1231(a)(6) that any post-removal period of detention may not exceed the "period reasonably necessary to bring about that alien's removal from the United States." Id. at 689. Although a detention of up to six months is presumptively reasonable under Zadvydas, Zadvydas does not give the government free reign to confine aliens. Id. at 701. Detention is only permissible "until it has been determined that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future." Id.Petitioner is ordered to show cause by January 19, 2026, why there is no significant likelihood he will be removed from the country in the reasonably foreseeable future, such that his detention is unlawful under Zadvydas.(RGS, law3) (Entered: 01/08/2026)
Jan 08, 2026
Order