Central District of California • 5:25-cv-03442

#1

Dec 17, 2025

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-41123656 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner MODESTA ARAUJO-CONTRERAS. (Attorney Nicolette Glazer added to party MODESTA ARAUJO-CONTRERAS(pty:pet))(Glazer, Nicolette) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

#2

Dec 18, 2025

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner MODESTA ARAUJO-CONTRERAS. (Glazer, Nicolette) (Entered: 12/18/2025)

#3

Dec 18, 2025

NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Michael B. Kaufman. New Case Number 5:25-cv-03442-KK-MBK. (car) (Entered: 12/18/2025)

#4

Dec 18, 2025

Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas) - optional html form

#5

Dec 18, 2025

Emergency EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to unlawful immigration detention filed by Petitioner Modesta Araujo-Contreras. (Glazer, Nicolette) (Entered: 12/18/2025)

#6

Dec 18, 2025

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order. (Dkt. 5 ). Respondents are hereby ordered to file an Opposition no later than December 19, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (doc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/18/2025)

Dec 18, 2025

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#7

Dec 19, 2025

Objection/Opposition (Motion related)

#8

Dec 23, 2025

Temporary Restraining Order

#9

Dec 30, 2025

Response

#10

Jan 02, 2026

Reply (Motion related)

#11

Jan 20, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: The Court is in receipt of Respondents' Response and Petitioner's Reply filed in response to this Court's December 23, 2025 Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why the Court should not issue a preliminary injunction. (Dkts. 9, 10 ). In light of the bond hearing held on December 30, 2025, (Dkt. 9 at 1), and Petitioner's representation that Petitioner is currently "subject to an ankle monitoring and strict conditions of supervision," (Dkt. 10 at 14), Petitioner's request for injunctive relief relating to Petitioner's detention appears to be moot. To the extent Petitioner seeks injunctive relief beyond the scope of this Court's December 23, 2025 Order, (Dkt. 8 ), such request is DENIED because such issues have not been properly briefed. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a preliminary injunction. The Court's December 23, 2025 OSC is DISCHARGED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (doc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/20/2026)

Jan 20, 2026

Text Only Scheduling Notice

#12

Jan 21, 2026

Chief Magistrate Judge Transferring Case (non-consent)

#13

Feb 23, 2026

Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition