Completed
Case Information
Filed: September 15, 2026
Assigned to:
Brian E. Murphy
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: September 28, 2026
Last Activity:
September 28, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 15, 2026
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12035442 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Angel Bernardo Chavez Quiroa. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form Chavez Quiroa, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet Chavez Quiroa)(Cornish, Carin) Modified on 9/15/2026 (Reyna-Demes, Charles). (Entered: 09/15/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Sep 15, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (CAM) (Entered: 09/15/2026)
Sep 15, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#3
Sep 16, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MBM) (Entered: 09/16/2026)
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
#4
Sep 16, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. Respondents shall determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 17, 2026.Respondents shall provide any further answer to the Petition, if necessary, no later than 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 22, 2026.(MBM) (Entered: 09/16/2026)
Main Document:
Service Order-2241 Petition
#5
Sep 16, 2026
Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) emailed to Duty AUSA Matthew Lyons and mailed to all respondents on 9/16/2026. (MBM) (Entered: 09/16/2026)
#6
Sep 16, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Erica McMahon on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling (McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 09/16/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
Sep 16, 2026
Copy Mailed
#7
Sep 17, 2026
MOTION to Dismiss and Response to Court Order ECF 4 by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 09/17/2026)
Main Document:
Dismiss
#8
Sep 17, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Petitioner is ORDERED to respond to Respondents' 7 motion to dismiss on or before 3:00 p.m. on Monday, September 21, 2026. (MBM) (Entered: 09/17/2026)
Sep 17, 2026
Order
#9
Sep 18, 2026
Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Response to Court Order ECF 4 filed by Angel Bernardo Chavez Quiroa. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Affidavit of Juan Chavez)(Cornish, Carin) (Entered: 09/18/2026)
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
#10
Sep 18, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER - The parties present materially different accounts of Petitioner's signing of Form I-210. Compare Dkt. 7 at 1, with Dkt. 9 at 1, and Dkt. 9-1. Therefore, an evidentiary will be held before this Court at 12:45 p.m. on Thursday, September 24, 2026, in Courtroom 12, to resolve these dueling factual assertions. See Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 312 (1963) ("[T]he power of inquiry on federal habeas corpus is plenary."), overruled in part on other grounds by Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 5 (1992); 28 U.S.C. 2243 (The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of the matter as law and justice require.); cf. R. Gov. § 2254 Cases 8(a) ("If the petition is not dismissed, the judge must review the answer... and any materials submitted... to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted."). The individual who provided the "oral interpretation/written translation," Dkt. 7-1 at 3, shall be present at the hearing, as shall the DHS witnesses who were present when Petitioner signed the documents included in Dkt. 7-1. Counsel for Petitioner is informed that the Court cannot provide an interpreter in civil cases, so any interpreter, if desired, must be provided by Petitioner.In addition, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing which comports with the standards articulated in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19, 26 (1st Cir. 2021), and in which the presiding immigration judge ("IJ") considers alternatives to detention. Respondents shall release Petitioner by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, September 25, 2026, unless, before that time, Petitioner is provided with such a bond hearing. Respondents are thereby ORDERED to file a status report by 12:00 p.m. on Monday, September 28, 2026, detailing their compliance with this order. If a bond hearing was held, the status report shall state whether Petitioner has been granted bond, the date, time, and location of his release, or, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial. Respondents should include a copy of the IJ's decision with the status report. NOTICE OF HEARING:Hearing set for 9/24/2026 at 12:45 p.m. in Courtroom 12 (In person only) before Judge Brian E. Murphy. (BIB) (Entered: 09/18/2026)
Sep 18, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings
#11
Sep 23, 2026
STIPULATION of Dismissal AND JOINT REQUEST TO VACATE HEARING by Todd Blanche, Angel Bernardo Chavez Quiroa, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling. (McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 09/23/2026)
Main Document:
Stipulation of Dismissal
#12
Sep 23, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 11 Joint Request to Vacate 9/24/2026 Hearing. (BIB) (Entered: 09/23/2026)
Sep 23, 2026
1 - Terminate Hearings AND Order
#13
Sep 24, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The parties’ joint stipulation states that “ICE ERO Boston utilized the agency’s standard business practices in presenting Petitioner with the Form I-210, Voluntary Departure and Verification of Departure, and Form I-210A, Addendum to DHS Form I-210-Alien Declaration, and acquiring his signature.” Dkt. 11 ¶ 2. The stipulation further states that “[u]pon the agency’s reflection of Petitioner’s allegations in his opposition to Respondents’ motion to dismiss, the ICE ERO Boston agrees to make the following change to its practice: ICE ERO Boston agrees to use an interpreter to execute the Form I-210 and the Form I-210A in the aliens’ preferred language, and that the interpreter’s identifying information will be contained on the Form I-210A moving forward.” Id. ¶ 3 (emphasis added). The Court reads these statements together to indicate that Petitioner did not receive adequate interpretation or translation of the Form I-210, and that the statement on the form that “[t]he alien was provided an oral interpretation/written translation of this Declaration in the alien’s preferred language,” Dkt. 7 -1 at 3, was inaccurate. Respondents are ORDERED to confirm or deny the accuracy of the Court’s interpretation by no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, September 25, 2026. If the Court has misinterpreted the statements in the stipulation, and Respondents’ position is that Petitioner did receive adequate interpretation or translation, Respondents should submit an affidavit, signed under the pains of perjury, by the party who conducted the interpretation or translation, fully explaining the circumstances of the document signing, including when and where it occurred, and who was present and observed. At a minimum, if this party is not Kelsey Leydon, a separate affidavit from Ms. Leydon must be included detailing the reason her signature is appended on page three of Dkt. 7 -1. (MAC) (Entered: 09/24/2026)
Sep 24, 2026
Order
#14
Sep 25, 2026
RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling re 13 Order,,,,,,,, . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 09/25/2026)
Main Document:
Response to Court Order
#15
Sep 28, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. In light of the parties’ stipulation of dismissal 11, the petition is DENIED as moot. (MBM) (Entered: 09/28/2026)
#16
Sep 28, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT... In accordance with this Courts Order (ECF #15) issued on September 28, 2026, denying the Petitioners Writ of Habeas Corpus, it is hereby ORDERED: Judgment for the Respondents against the Petitioner. (MBM) (Entered: 09/28/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Sep 28, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm
Firm