Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-01805
CHOCOOJ GUITZ v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Active
Case Information
Filed: September 14, 2026
Assigned to:
J. Nicholas Ranjan
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity:
September 29, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Sep 14, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $5, receipt number 300001259), filed by MARVIN CHOCOOJ GUITZ. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Receipt, # 3 Envelope) (tla) (Entered: 09/15/2026)
Main Document:
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
Sep 14, 2026
Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (tla)
#2
Sep 16, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document:
Case Management Order
#4
Sep 28, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by A.T.O.D., ATTORNEY GENERAL, ICE, THE WARDEN. (Anglin, Molly) (Entered: 09/28/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#5
Sep 29, 2026
ORDER. For the reasons stated in Buele Morocho v. Warden Phila. FDC, No. 26-1150, 2026 WL 2546223 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2026), the Court GRANTS the 1 habeas petition and ISSUES the writ, on these terms: (1) Respondents shall cause Petitioner to be taken to a neutral immigration judge of the Executive Office of Immigration Review for an individualized bond hearing to occur within 30 days of this order, or else release Petitioner by such date. (2) Respondents shall ensure that such a hearing include the required due process, i.e., at a minimum, factfinding based on a record produced before the decisionmaker and disclosed to Petitioner; an opportunity to make arguments on the Petitioner's behalf; and the right to an individualized determination of Petitioner's interests. See Ghanem v. Warden Essex Cnty. Corr. Facility, No. 21-1908, 2022 WL 574624, at *2 (3d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022). (3) Petitioner shall be responsible for securing the necessary transcripts and record of the bond hearing. The Court further finds that Respondents' position was substantially justified in this case, so no fees shall be awarded. The Court trusts the immigration judge to comply with this order and ensure that Petitioner is provided due process, and therefore the immigration judge shall explain his or her individualized determination on the record. See Kamara v. Atty Gen. of U.S., 420 F.3d 202, 212 (3d Cir. 2005). The Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/29/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 09/29/2026)
#6
Sep 29, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT, entered consistent with the above order (ECF 5). Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/29/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 09/29/2026)
Sep 29, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Sep 29, 2026
Order
Parties
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Party
CHOCOOJ GUITZ
Party