Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06727
(HC) Mendoza Pajan v. Andrews
Completed
Case Information
Filed: August 24, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: September 02, 2026
Last Activity:
September 03, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 24, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews by Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 24, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#3
Aug 24, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#4
Aug 24, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
#5
Aug 25, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#6
Aug 25, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order, the court ORDERS that respondent shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondent shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance if they have not already done so. Respondent shall file a written opposition to the pending 3 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Thursday, 8/27/2026. In that opposition, respondent shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Zurita Navarro v. Warden, Cent. Valley Annex Det. Facility, No. 1:26-cv-05661-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 2294963 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2026); Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondent opposes this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondent is DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in its opposition. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Aug 25, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk PAB)
Aug 25, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 25, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
Aug 25, 2026
Minute Order
#7
Aug 28, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Tonya Andrews (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#8
Aug 28, 2026
REQUEST for EXTENSION until 5:00 PM on 8/31/2026 to file Opposition to 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Tonya Andrews. (Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 9/1/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Main Document:
Request
#9
Aug 30, 2026
OPPOSITION to 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Tonya Andrews. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Yu, Jonathan) Modified on 9/2/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 08/30/2026)
Main Document:
OPPOSITION
#10
Sep 02, 2026
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/02/2026 GRANTING Petitioner's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and GRANTING Respondent's 8 Motion for Extension of Time to file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. Respondent is ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner Alain Mendoza Pajan, A# 220-783-692, from Respondent's custody. Respondent is ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-detaining Petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without written notice and hearing before an immigration judge where Respondents will have the burden of establishing that Petitioner is either a flight risk or danger to the community by clear and convincing evidence. Petitioner's 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel are DENIED as having been rendered moot by this order granting him habeas relief. CASE CLOSED. (cc: Golden State Annex) (Deputy Clerk KS) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
#11
Sep 02, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *09/02/2026* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/02/2026 in favor of Petitioner. (Deputy Clerk KS) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Sep 02, 2026
Service by Mail
Sep 02, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Order and 11 Judgment served on Alain Mendoza Pajan. (Deputy Clerk KS)
#12
Sep 03, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/04/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Parties
Andrews
Party
(HC) Mendoza Pajan
Party