Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01870

#1

Dec 15, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS and REQUEST for Injunctive Relief against Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, Todd M. Lyons by Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#2

Dec 15, 2025

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#3

Dec 15, 2025

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#4

Dec 16, 2025

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

Dec 16, 2025

SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR)

Dec 16, 2025

RECEIPT NUMBER 100006714: $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus from Geo Secure Services fbo Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR)

Dec 16, 2025

Service by Mail

#5

Dec 17, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/17/2025: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the petition and will issue a briefing order. In the meantime, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not remove petitioner from the United States nor transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Under the circumstances, the Court finds that this Order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending the Court's review of the petition. (Deputy Clerk WAK) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

#6

Dec 17, 2025

ORDER DENYING 3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/17/2025. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

#7

Dec 17, 2025

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Petition Should Not be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/17/2025. Respondent is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Petition should not be granted. The Response to the Order to Show Cause is due within THIRTY (30) days of the date of service of this order. Petitioner may file a Traverse to the Response within THIRTY (30) days of the date the Response to the Order to Show Cause is filed with the Court. The Court has determined that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(h). As such, the matter will be taken under submission following the filing of Petitioner's Traverse or the expiration of the time for filing the Traverse. All other briefing in this action is suspended. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/17/2025)

Dec 17, 2025

Service by Mail

Dec 17, 2025

Minute Order

Dec 17, 2025

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, 7 Order to Show Cause served on Van Phung Vo. (Deputy Clerk OFR)