District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-14020

Niz Tomas v. Wesling

Active

Case Information

Filed: September 01, 2026
Assigned to: Brian E. Murphy
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: September 03, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Sep 01, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-12000743 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Rudy Isidro Niz Tomas. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(MacMurray, Kevin) Modified on 9/1/2026 to remove duplicate text (LBO). (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Sep 01, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (MAC) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Sep 01, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#3
Sep 02, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MBM) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
#4
Sep 02, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. Respondents shall determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 1:00 p.m. on September 3, 2026.Respondents shall provide any further answer to the Petition, if necessary, no later than 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 8, 2026.(MBM) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
Main Document: Service Order-2241 Petition
#5
Sep 02, 2026
Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) emailed to Duty AUSA Raquelle Kaye and mailed to all respondents on 9/2/2026. (MBM) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
#6
Sep 02, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar on behalf of Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Markwayne Mullen, David Venturella, David Wesling (Farquhar, Rayford) (Entered: 09/02/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
Sep 02, 2026
Copy Mailed
#7
Sep 03, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Engingro, III on behalf of Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Markwayne Mullen, David Venturella, David Wesling (Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#8
Sep 03, 2026
RESPONSE/ANSWER to Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Markwayne Mullen, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Engingro, Vincent) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#9
Sep 03, 2026
NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Rayford A. Farquhar (Farquhar, Rayford) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance
#10
Sep 03, 2026
Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. “Respondents submit that the legal issues presented in this Petition are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Tschimayi v. Moniz, Civil Action No. 26-cv-13908 (D. Mass. Aug. 26, 2026).” Dkt. 8 at 1. In that case, the Court ordered a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) based on Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 2026 WL 2352042, at *11 (1st Cir. Aug. 13, 2026), which held that “[n]oncitizens like [Petitioner] who are present in the United States without admission are not subject to § 1225(b)(2)(A)’s mandatory detention provision, but rather, are governed by § 1226." Therefore, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing here. See Guerrero Orellana, 2026 WL 2352042, at *1 ("[T]he district court was right to order the government to release Guerrero Orellana or provide him with a bond hearing."). The Court further held in Tschimayi petitioners are not required to exhaust their administrative remedies. Tschimayi, No. 26-cv-13908, Dkt. 8 (citing Waters Rossin v. Moniz, 26-cv-13436, Dkt. 12 (D. Mass. Aug. 4, 2026); Gonzalez Urizar v. Hyde, 26-cv-13865, Dkt. 9 (D. Mass. Aug. 26, 2026)).Accordingly, the Petition is GRANTED in part. Respondents shall release Petitioner by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 10, 2026, unless, before that time, Petitioner is provided a bond hearing which comports with the standards articulated in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19, 26 (1st Cir. 2021), and in which the presiding immigration judge (“IJ”) considers alternatives to detention. Respondents are thereby ORDERED to file a status report by 12:00 p.m. on Friday, September 11, 2026, detailing their compliance with this order. If a bond hearing was held, the status report shall state whether Petitioner has been granted bond, the date, time, and location of his release, or, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial. Respondents should include a copy of the IJ’s decision with the status report.Any request for fees should be filed within the deadlines set by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.(MBM) (Entered: 09/03/2026)
Sep 03, 2026
Order