Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:25-cv-00525
Fabian Arias v. LYONS
Active
Case Information
Filed: December 15, 2025
Assigned to:
Keith A. Pesto
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity:
June 26, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Dec 15, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Verified) (Filing fee $5, receipt number APAWDC-9250664), filed by Oscar Neftali Fabian Arias. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Green, Brian) (Entered: 12/15/2025)
Main Document:
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#3
Jan 17, 2026
Expedite
Main Document:
Expedite
Jan 20, 2026
Order on Motion to Expedite
Mar 18, 2026
Order Response/Briefing Schedule
#14
May 18, 2026
Expedite
Main Document:
Expedite
Jun 01, 2026
Status Report Order
#17
Jun 10, 2026
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Oscar Neftali Fabian Arias. Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2026. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 6/10/2026. (dlh)
Jun 23, 2026
Order on Motion to Expedite
#19
Jun 26, 2026
MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1 hereby is GRANTED. Respondents are directed to provide Petitioner with the statutory process required under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), which includes a bond heari ng before a neutral immigration judge within seven (7) days of this Order; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the bond hearing shall include an individualized determination of whether Petitioner poses a danger to the community or a flight risk under the ordinary § 1226(a) framework. The immigration judge shall state the reasons for the custody determination orally on the record or in writing. If bond is denied, the immigration judge shall identify the principal facts and evidence relied upon i n determining that Petitioner poses a danger to the community, a flight risk, or both. Nothing in this Order requires the immigration judge to reach any particular custody determination; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that if Petitioner is not provided with a bond hearing by the timeframe specified, or if the immigration judge declines to conduct a bond hearing based on Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025), or Matter of Q. Li, 29 I&N Dec. 66 (BIA 2025), or the statutory interpretati on of Section 1225(b)(2) that this Court has rejected, the writ shall issue and Respondents shall immediately release Petitioner from custody; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall provide notice to the Court of the outcome of the individ ualized bond hearing within seven (7) days of the date of the immigration judge's decision; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Lanzillo's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17 ) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 6/26/2026. (dlg)
#20
Jun 26, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Main Document:
Judgment (Rule 58)