Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06942

#1

Aug 31, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden of the California City Detention Facility by Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#2

Aug 31, 2026

MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#3

Aug 31, 2026

MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#4

Aug 31, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#5

Aug 31, 2026

ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey signed by Magistrate Judge Frank J. Singer on 08/31/2026. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#6

Aug 31, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#7

Aug 31, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Quinn Disparte, GOVT for Warden of the California City Detention Facility (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

#8

Aug 31, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 8/31/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 4 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 4 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before September 2, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (gm) (Entered: 08/31/2026)

Aug 31, 2026

Minute Order

Aug 31, 2026

Service by Mail

Aug 31, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Immigration New Case Documents, 5 Order Authorizing IFP Status, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk SZ)

#9

Sep 02, 2026

RESPONSE to 8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE by Warden of the California City Detention Facility. (Attachments: # 1 I-200, # 2 I-213, # 3 Notice of Removal Hearing)(Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 09/02/2026)

#10

Sep 04, 2026

ORDER GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 9/4/2026. Respondents are ORDERED to provide petitioner a bond hearing within ten (10) days before a neutral decisionmaker. At this hearing, the burden will be on the government to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that petitioner is a flight risk or danger to the community, such that his physical custody is legally justified. Respondents shall immediately provide petitioner with a copy of this Order and shall provide him with 72 hours' written notice before a bond hearing in a language that he can understand. Petitioner may be represented by an attorney at this hearing, and respondents may extend the deadline at petitioner's request so that he can obtain an attorney. If petitioner obtains an attorney, his attorney shall also be given 72 hours' written notice before the bond hearing. The neutral decisionmaker must consider petitioner's financial circumstances in setting the amount of bond as well as alternative conditions of release. The motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED as moot. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

#11

Sep 04, 2026

JUDGMENT dated *9/4/2026* pursuant to 10 order. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 09/04/2026)

Sep 04, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Order, 11 Judgment served on Santiago Gabriel Salgado-Rimey. (Deputy Clerk OFR)

Sep 04, 2026

Service by Mail

#12

Sep 23, 2026

Enforce Judgment