Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01875

#1

Dec 15, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Pamela Jo Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem by Leonardo Lopez Bohorquez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Order)(Robinson, Emily) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

#2

Dec 15, 2025

Temporary Restraining Order

#3

Dec 15, 2025

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 1/20/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk CRM) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

#4

Dec 15, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/15/2025: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised therein appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD; Singh v. Andrews, No. 1:25-cv-01543-DJC-SCR; Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Souza v. Robbins, No. 1:25-cv-01597-DJC-JDP. On or before December 17, 2025, Respondents are ordered to show cause as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinct from the Court's prior orders in the cases listed above and would justify denial of Preliminary Injunction. Petitioner may follow a reply on or before December 18, 2025. The matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk JZ) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

Dec 15, 2025

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12673253. (Robinson, Emily)

Dec 15, 2025

Minute Order

#5

Dec 16, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Hemesath, Audrey) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#6

Dec 17, 2025

Opposition to Motion

#7

Dec 18, 2025

Reply to Response to Motion

#8

Dec 19, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/19/2025: In light of Respondents concession that there are no factual or legal issues in this case that render this case distinct from the prior cases cited in the Court's prior minute order (see ECF No. 4 ) and for the reasons stated in the orders in those prior cases, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ) is GRANTED. Respondents are ordered to immediately release Petitioner Leonardo Lopez Bohorquez from their custody. Respondents shall not impose any additional restrictions on him, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing. Respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-arresting or re-detaining Petitioner absent compliance with constitutional protections, which include, at a minimum, pre-deprivation notice describing the change of circumstances necessitating his arrest and detention, and a timely hearing. At any such hearing, the Government shall bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that Petitioner poses a danger to the community or a risk of flight, and Petitioner shall be allowed to have his counsel present. Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before December 26, 2025, as to why this Court should not issue a preliminary injunction on the same terms as this Order. The Respondents failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause shall be construed as its non-opposition to the Court granting a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms and conditions imposed in this Order. See L.R. 230(c). On or before December 30, 2025, Petitioner may file a Reply, if any. The request for Preliminary Injunction is not currently set for a hearing, but the Court may subsequently order one if it determines a hearing is necessary. Besides the request for Preliminary Injunction, the merits of this matter are stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in the appeal of Rodriguez v. Bostock, 25-6842. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 12/19/2025)

Dec 19, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Dec 30, 2025

Minute Order