Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06859

#1

Aug 27, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex by Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)

#2

Aug 27, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)

#3

Aug 27, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)

#4

Aug 27, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Warden, Central Valley Annex (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/27/2026)

#5

Aug 27, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 8/27/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before August 31, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (gm) (Entered: 08/27/2026)

Aug 27, 2026

RECEIPT number 100009383 for $5.00 for Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez from Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez. (Deputy Clerk SZ)

Aug 27, 2026

Minute Order

Aug 27, 2026

Service by Mail

Aug 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez. (Deputy Clerk SZ)

Aug 28, 2026

Service by Mail

Aug 28, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order, served on Kenjerber Jose Camejo-Gomez. (Deputy Clerk YV)

#6

Aug 31, 2026

Dismiss

#8

Oct 02, 2026

Miscellaneous Relief