Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06825
(HC) Napoles-Garcia v. Warden, California City Correction Center
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 26, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
October 05, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 26, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Alejandro Mayorkas, Caleb Vitello, Warden, California City Correction Center by Edisnier Napoles-Garcia. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 26, 2026
MOTION for Immediate Release or, in the Alternative, for a Bond Hearing by Edisnier Napoles-Garcia. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
Aug 26, 2026
RECEIPT number 100009374 for $5.00 for Edisnier Napoles-Garcia from Edisnier Napoles-Garcia. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
#3
Aug 27, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Aug 27, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Attorney Quinn Disparte, GOVT added for All Respondents. (Disparte, Quinn) Modified on 9/2/2026 (KS). (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Aug 27, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Edisnier Napoles-Garcia. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
Aug 27, 2026
Service by Mail
#5
Aug 28, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 8/28/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, No. 25-6842, 2026 WL 2196424, at *3 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). Further, this court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 9/1/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Rodriguez Vazquez, Tinoco, Labrador-Prato, and D.L.C. Petitioner may file a Reply by 9/15/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.(Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Aug 28, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Aug 28, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Edisnier Napoles-Garcia. (Deputy Clerk MCF)
Aug 28, 2026
Service by Mail
#6
Sep 01, 2026
OPPOSITION to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by All Respondents. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5) (Disparte, Quinn) Modified on 9/3/2026 (KS). (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Main Document:
Opposition to Motion
#7
Sep 08, 2026
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 09/10/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT/DECLINE
Oct 01, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings
Oct 01, 2026
Service by Mail
#9
Oct 05, 2026
06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response
Main Document:
06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response
Oct 05, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Napoles-Garcia
Party
Warden, California City Correction Center
Party