Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-05079

Lugo Gutierrez v. Mullin

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 06, 2026
Assigned to: Orlando Luis Garcia
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 21, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 06, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 12396), filed by Nixon Rafael Lugo Gutierrez.(r013) Modified on 8/11/2026 To edit text (bc). (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 06, 2026
PRO SE MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Stay of Removal by Nixon Rafael Lugo Gutierrez. (bc) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Stay AND Temporary Restraining Order
Aug 06, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephenson (bc)
Aug 06, 2026
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA (bc)
Aug 11, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
Aug 11, 2026
Remark (No Doc#)
Aug 12, 2026
Text Order DENYING 2 Motion for Stay of Removal. The Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the relief requested in Petitioner's motion. "A request for a stay of removal is a challenge to a removal order." See Imran v. Harper, No. 25-30370, 2026 WL 93131, at *1 (5th Cir. Jan. 13, 2026). District courts generally "lack[] jurisdiction to grant such relief." Id. Federal courts lack jurisdiction over "claims connected directly and immediately with a 'decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders.'" Humphries v. Various Fed. USINS Emps., 164 F.3d 936, 943 (5th Cir. 1999) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g)). Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
Aug 12, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
Aug 12, 2026
Order on Motion to Stay
Aug 12, 2026
Text Order DENYING 2 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Because the injunctive relief Petitioner now seeks on a preliminary and ex parte basis is identical to the ultimate relief sought on the merits of this already-expedited habeas proceeding, the Motion is DENIED. The Court will resolve Petitioner's request for relief by ruling on the merits of the writ itself. See Garcia-Aleman v. Thompson, No. 25-CV-00886-OLG (W.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2025) (collecting cases) (Dkt. No. 20). Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1)
#3
Aug 14, 2026
ORDER FOR SERVICE-- It is further ORDERED that Respondents must file a response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) within 7 days of electronic service. The response must identify all pertinent factual and procedural background information, including: (a) the date Petitioner entered the United States; (b) whether Petitioner was previously apprehended and then released by immigration authorities; and (c) the status of Petitioners immigration and/or removal proceedings, including the date his detention began. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days thereafter.. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Main Document: Order
#4
Aug 21, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Anderson, Edmond) (Entered: 08/21/2026)
Main Document: Response

Parties

Lugo Gutierrez
Party
Mullin
Party