Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06628
(HC) Juarez v. Chestnut
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 20, 2026
Assigned to:
Kirk E. Sherriff
Referred to:
Frank J. Singer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Active
Last Activity:
August 21, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 20, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR OF THE SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE, Markwayne Mullin by Eusebio Leal Juarez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13759103) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit)(Sale, Jacqueline) (Entered: 08/20/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 20, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 08/20/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#3
Aug 20, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for Christopher Chestnut,Anthony Andrews for Current or Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Anthony Andrews for Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, San Francisco Field Office,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/20/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#4
Aug 21, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 8/21/2026: The Court has reviewed the filings in this case, Leal Juarez v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-06628-KES-FJS, and in Leal Juarez v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-06426-TLN-AC. After reviewing the filings in each case, the Court finds that this case (1:26-cv-06628-KES-FJS) involves the same petitioner, alleges identical facts, and requests identical relief as case no. 1:26-cv-06426-TLN-AC. The Court notes that the petition in this case has several exhibits that appear to be immigration documents for someone other than the petitioner, but the petitions otherwise appear to be identical. A court may dismiss one action as duplicative of another. See M.M. v. Lafayette Sch. Dist., 681 F.3d 1082, 1091 (9th Cir. 2012). Because this action is essentially identical to the earlier filed case, this case (1:26-cv-06628-KES-FJS) is DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. (Deputy Clerk YV) (Entered: 08/21/2026)
Aug 21, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
Chestnut
Party
(HC) Juarez
Party