Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06579
(HC) Chavez Montes v. Andrews
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 18, 2026
Assigned to:
Dena M. Coggins
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
August 21, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 18, 2026
2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against ICE/ERO, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche, Tonya Andrews, David Venturella by Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 18, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#3
Aug 18, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
#4
Aug 18, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#5
Aug 18, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk SZ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#6
Aug 18, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Tonya Andrews,Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for ICE/ERO,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin,Anthony Andrews for David Venturella (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Aug 18, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 18, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Deputy Clerk SZ)
#7
Aug 19, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 8/19/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. From these filings, it is unclear whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, or whether the challenged detention is Petitioner's first contact with immigration authorities. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, No. 25-6842, 2026 WL 2196424, at *3 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). This court has previously addressed claims where noncitizens were re-detained after being released from immigration custody (see, e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026)), and where noncitizens were detained by immigration authorities for the first time after having lived in the United States for an extended period of time (See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026); Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026)). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 8/21/2026. In their response, Respondents shall indicate whether Petitioner has previously been released from immigration custody, and shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Rodriguez Vazquez and this court's applicable orders cited above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 9/4/2026. Finally, the court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Both parties shall address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 08/19/2026)
Aug 19, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Jose Luis Chavez Montes. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
Aug 19, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 19, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
#8
Aug 21, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document:
Dismiss
Parties
Andrews
Party
(HC) Chavez Montes
Party