District of New Jersey • 2:25-cv-18540

AYGUN v. SOTO

Active

Case Information

Filed: December 11, 2025
Assigned to: Michael E. Farbiarz
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: January 09, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Dec 11, 2025
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-16904057.), filed by SEHER AYGUN. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A ICE Detainee Locator last visited 11Dec2025, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B Asylum Application Receipt for Petitioner's Spouse, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C Petitioner's Asylum Biometrics Notice, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D Petitioner's Employment Authorization Document)(ARCHAMBEAULT, MATTHEW) (Entered: 12/11/2025)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Dec 11, 2025
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by SEHER AYGUN. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(ARCHAMBEAULT, MATTHEW) (Entered: 12/11/2025)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
Dec 12, 2025
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Dec 12, 2025
Order
#5
Dec 14, 2025
Substitution of Attorney
Main Document: Substitution of Attorney
#6
Dec 24, 2025
Letter
Main Document: Letter
#7
Jan 05, 2026
TEXT ORDER: The Respondents shall respond to the Petitioner's letter at ECF 6 via a letter brief filed on or before January 8 at 10am. So Ordered by Judge Michael E. Farbiarz on 1/5/26. (ro, ) (Entered: 01/05/2026)
Jan 05, 2026
Order
#8
Jan 08, 2026
Letter
Main Document: Letter
#9
Jan 09, 2026
TEXT ORDER: The Petitioner argued his liberty was restrained, via the requirement he wear an ankle monitor --- even though the Immigration Judge had not imposed that condition. See ECF 6 . Restraints on liberty must be authorized by law. If the Respondents view the Petitioner as having misstated the factual record, or if there is a lawful basis for imposition of the referenced ankle monitor in spite of the Immigration Judge not having imposed that requirement, the Respondents shall file a letter explaining their position or before January 12 at noon. If no letter is received by then, or if the letter is not persuasive, the Court will order that the ankle monitor be promptly removed. So Ordered by Judge Michael E. Farbiarz on 1/9/26. (ro, ) (Entered: 01/09/2026)
Jan 09, 2026
Order