Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06465

(HC) Ma v. Chestnut

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 13, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Jeremy D. Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: August 21, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 13, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella by Xuemei MA. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lee, Ding-I) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aug 13, 2026
PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13728262. (Lee, Ding-I)
#2
Aug 14, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#3
Aug 14, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Sergio Albarran,Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for Christopher Chestnut,Anthony Andrews for Executive Office for Immigration Review,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin,Anthony Andrews for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Anthony Andrews for David J. Venturella (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#4
Aug 14, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/14/2026: Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding in pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it "plainly appears" that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, the court orders the government to respond to the petition and sets a briefing schedule. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondents must file a response to the petition. 2. A response may be one of the following: A. An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by respondents that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner's claims. B. A motion to dismiss the petition. 3. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondents must file any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition. 4. If respondents file an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a traverse within seven days of the date of service of respondents' answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 5. If respondents move to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within seven days of the date of service of respondents' motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered submitted twenty-one days after the service of the motion or when the reply is filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(l). (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
#5
Aug 14, 2026
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/14/2026: Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding through counsel, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it "plainly appears" that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, the court orders the government to respond to the petition and sets a briefing schedule. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondents must file a response to the petition. 2. A response may be one of the following: A. An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by respondents that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner's claims. B. A motion to dismiss the petition. 3. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondents must file any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition. 4. If respondents file an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a traverse within seven days of the date of service of respondents' answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 5. If respondents move to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within seven days of the date of service of respondents' motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered submitted twenty-one days after the service of the motion or when the reply is filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(l). (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Aug 14, 2026
Minute Order
#6
Aug 21, 2026
Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document: Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Parties

Chestnut
Party
(HC) Ma
Party