Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01825

#1

Dec 11, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, Minga Woffard, Tony lyons by Jagraj Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12665395) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit E, # 4 Declaration, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet )(Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

#2

Dec 11, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jagraj Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit E, # 4 Declaration, # 5 Proposed Order, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 TRO Checklist) (Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

#3

Dec 11, 2025

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/15/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk JJD) (Entered: 12/11/2025)

#4

Dec 12, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/12/2025: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). Respondents shall file any Opposition to the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order on or before December 16, 2025. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before December 17, 2025. The matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 12/12/2025)

Dec 12, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#5

Dec 16, 2025

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Robin Tubesing, GOVT for Moises Becerra,Robin Tubesing, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,Robin Tubesing, GOVT for Todd Lyons,Robin Tubesing, GOVT for Kristi Noem,Robin Tubesing, GOVT for Minga Wofford (Tubesing, Robin) (Entered: 12/16/2025)

#6

Dec 16, 2025

Opposition to Motion

#7

Dec 18, 2025

RESPONSE to 6 Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Jagraj Singh. (Kaur, Simranjit) Modified on 12/22/2025 (KS). (Entered: 12/18/2025)

#8

Dec 18, 2025

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#9

Dec 22, 2025

RESPONSE to 8 Order to Show Cause by All Respondents. (Tubesing, Robin) Modified on 1/7/2026 (KS). (Entered: 12/22/2025)

#10

Dec 30, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 12/30/2025: On December 18, 2025, the Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order and ordered Respondents to show cause by December 24, 2025, why a preliminary injunction should not issue on the same terms. (ECF No. 8 .) Respondents submitted a response in which they raise arguments previously rejected by this court and ultimately concede that there are no factual or legal issues in this case that render this case distinct from the prior cases cited in the Court's previous order. (ECF No. 9 at 3; see ECF No. 8 .) As such, for the reasons stated in the orders in those prior cases, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED and issued on the same terms set forth in the Temporary Restraining Order (id.) and shall remain in effect until the resolution of this action or until otherwise ordered by the Court. This matter is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 12/30/2025)

Dec 30, 2025

Minute Order

#11

Jan 16, 2026

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaur, Simranjit) (Entered: 01/16/2026)

#12

Jan 30, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/30/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondent is GRANTED 7 (seven) days within which to inform the court whether Respondent intends to stand on the record as is or if Respondent wishes to present further briefing and evidence. If Respondent elects to stand on the existing record, the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus will be deemed submitted to the court for decision. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk LMK) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

Jan 30, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#13

Feb 05, 2026

STATEMENT of Respondent re: (#12) Minute Order filed by Respondents. (Tubesing, Robin) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

#14

Feb 10, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/10/2026: Petitioner is proceeding with a 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging arrest and detention by ICE. The district court has ordered, by way of preliminary injunctive relief, Petitioner's release and that rearrest not occur absent certain protections. Prior to arrest, Petitioner was released into the United States by ICE premised upon either an explicit or implicit finding that Petitioner was not dangerous or a flight risk. While on release, Petitioner did not commit any crimes, materially complied with conditions of release and petitioner is not subject to an order of removal. Considering all of these factors, and consistent with the court's rulings in Martinez v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-1826 TLN CKD P, ECF No. 14 ; Rebolledo v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-1904 CKD P, ECF No. 15 ; and Esteban-Escalante v. Warden, Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center, 1:26-cv-0096 DC CKD P, ECF No. 10, the court finds Petitioner's Fifth Amendment right to due process was violated, RECOMMENDS THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE GRANTED, THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PREVIOUSLY GRANTED BE MADE PERMANENT and THIS CASE BE CLOSED. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within seven (7) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within seven (7) days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk LMK) (Entered: 02/10/2026)

Feb 10, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#15

Feb 25, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations

#16

Feb 25, 2026

Judgment