District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13743

Ribeiro Correia v. Wesling

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 13, 2026
Assigned to: Allison Dale Burroughs
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 21, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 13, 2026
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11958930 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Cleverson Ribeiro Correia. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Category Form)(Kalil, Clarissa) Modified on 8/13/2026 to remove duplicate docket text (CEH). (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Aug 13, 2026
First MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Cleverson Ribeiro Correia. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kalil, Clarissa) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Aug 13, 2026
Proposed Summonses filed by Cleverson Ribeiro Correia as to Todd Blanche, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Kalil, Clarissa) Docket text Modified on 8/13/2026 (CAM). (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: Summons Returned Unexecuted
#4
Aug 13, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (MAC) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
#5
Aug 13, 2026
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay of Transfer or Removal. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than August 27, 2026.(CAM) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: Service Order-2241 Petition
#6
Aug 13, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CAM) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
#7
Aug 13, 2026
Copy re 5 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), emailed to Duty AUSA Mundele and mailed to Respondents on 8/13/2026. (CAM) (Entered: 08/13/2026)
Aug 13, 2026
Copy Mailed
Aug 13, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#8
Aug 14, 2026
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. On August 13, 2026, Petitioner Cleverson Ribeiro Correia, who is currently detained at the Plymouth County Correctional Facility in Plymouth, Massachusetts, filed a habeas corpus petition, [ECF No. 1 ], and motion for temporary restraining order, [ECF No. 2 ]. Petitioner previously filed a habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Ribeiro Correia v. Wesling, No. 26-cv-00585 (D.N.H. Aug. 13, 2026). On July 22, that court ordered that Petitioner receive a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). See id., Dkt. No. 8 (July 22, 2026). Petitioner received a bond hearing on July 30, 2026, [ECF No. 1 ¶ 2], after which the New Hampshire court ordered him to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed on the basis that Petitioner had received his requested relief, Ribiero Correia, No. 26-cv-00585, Dkt No. 12 (D.N.H. Aug. 5, 2026). Petitioner did not file anything further, and that action was dismissed. Id. Dkt. No. 13 (Aug. 13, 2026).Petitioner now seeks release from custody or a new bond hearing from this Court, on the basis that at his bond hearing, the immigration judge concluded that Petitioner posed a flight risk that could not be mitigated by bond or other conditions of release, which Petitioner argues was unsupported by the evidence in the record. See generally [ECF No. 1 ]. Without a complete record of Petitioner’s bond hearing, the Court cannot predict that Petitioner is likely to succeed on the merits, and moreover, given the exceedingly narrow scope of judicial review of bond hearings, it is unlikely, though not impossible, that Petitioner will ultimately be able to establish a likelihood of success on the merits. Further, it appears that Petitioner’s counsel did not attempt to give notice of this motion to counsel for Respondents. See [ECF No. 2 at 11]. The Court will not proceed on the motion ex parte, and lacks the record necessary to grant the Petitioner the relief he seeks at this stage. The motion, [ECF No. 2 ], is DENIED with leave to renew as a motion for preliminary injunction, supported by a complete record of Petitioner’s bond hearing, with notice to counsel for Respondents. (CAM) (Entered: 08/14/2026)
Aug 14, 2026
Order on Motion for TRO
#9
Aug 21, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance