Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06419

#1

Aug 12, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Immigration Processing Center by Jonatan De Leon Amaya. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

Aug 12, 2026

RECEIPT number 100009214 for $5.00 from Jonatan De Leon Amaya. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

#2

Aug 13, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

#3

Aug 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/13/2026: This matter is REFERRED to the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge for further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pending the Court's ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the Court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk RAA) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

#4

Aug 13, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Quinn Disparte, GOVT for Warden, California City Immigration Processing Center (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

#5

Aug 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/13/2026: Petitioner, an immigration detainee proceeding in pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response to the petition unless it "plainly appears" that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. It does not plainly appear that petitioner is not entitled to relief. Therefore, the court orders the government to respond to the petition and sets a briefing schedule. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file a response to the petition. 2. A response may be one of the following: A. An answer addressing the merits of the petition. Any argument by respondent that petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim must be raised in the answer, which must also address the merits of petitioner's claims. B. A motion to dismiss the petition. 3. Within seven days of the date of service of this order, respondent must file any documents necessary for resolving the issues presented in the petition. 4. If respondent files an answer to the petition, petitioner may file a traverse within seven days of the date of service of respondent's answer. If no traverse is filed within seven days, the petition and answer are deemed submitted. 5. If respondent moves to dismiss, petitioner must file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within seven days of the date of service of respondent's motion. Any reply to an opposition to the motion to dismiss must be filed within seven days after the opposition is served. The motion to dismiss will be considered submitted twenty-one days after the service of the motion or when the reply is filed, whichever comes first. See Local Rule 230(l). (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk NAC) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

Aug 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents served on Jonatan De Leon Amaya. (Deputy Clerk DAR)

Aug 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Minute Order served on Jonatan De Leon Amaya. (Deputy Clerk RAA)

Aug 13, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Jonatan De Leon Amaya. (Deputy Clerk NAC)

Aug 13, 2026

Minute Order

Aug 13, 2026

Service by Mail