District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13719

#1

Aug 12, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11955738 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Jude Salnave. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Exhibit Detainee Locator Page)(Burns, Matthew) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#2

Aug 12, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (MBM) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#3

Aug 12, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MBM) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#4

Aug 12, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL.Respondents shall determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 1:00 p.m. on Friday, August 14, 2026.Respondents shall provide any further answer to the Petition, if necessary, no later than 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 19, 2026.(MBM) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#5

Aug 12, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to Duty AUSA Julien Mundele and USAMA Civil Process, mailed to each respondents on 8/12/2026. (MBM) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

Aug 12, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

Aug 12, 2026

Copy Mailed

#6

Aug 14, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING the petition. The Court ordered Respondents to “determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 1:00 p.m. on Friday, August 14, 2026,” and, along with that response, provide “copies of any Notices to Appear, Warrants for Arrest of Alien, or Notices of Custody Determination issued in connection with Petitioner’s current detention.” Dkt. 4 at 2. The Court stated that “[i]f Respondents fail to respond as directed by either of the above deadlines, the Court will assume that Petitioner’s detention is unlawful and order that Petitioner be immediately released.” Id. Respondents failed to timely respond to the petition or to provide copies of any documents that support lawful detention of Petitioner. Because the Court has no basis to conclude that Petitioner’s detention is lawful, the petition is GRANTED and Petitioner is ORDERED immediately released. (MBM) (Entered: 08/14/2026)

Aug 14, 2026

Order

#7

Aug 20, 2026

Judgment