Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06309

(HC) Cortes Labrada v. Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 10, 2026
Assigned to: Dena M. Coggins
Referred to: Sean C. Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity: August 11, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 10, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility by Eliexer Cortes Labrada. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 10, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Eliexer Cortes Labrada. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Aug 10, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Eliexer Cortes Labrada. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Appoint Counsel
#4
Aug 11, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents
#5
Aug 11, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Yu, GOVT for Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility (Yu, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#6
Aug 11, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 8/11/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Noncitizens present without admission who are apprehended in the interior of the United States are subject discretionary detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, not mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A). See Rodriguez Vazquez v. Bostock, No. 25-6842, 2026 WL 2196424, at *3 (9th Cir. July 30, 2026). Petitioner appears to have been released from immigration custody previously, but it is unclear whether Petitioner is in active removal proceedings, and if so, what the status of those proceedings are. This court has previously addressed claims where noncitizens were re-detained after being released from immigration custody (see, e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 818 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025); Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1113 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025); D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026)), and where noncitizens were detained by immigration authorities to facilitate removal pursuant to a removal order. See, e.g., Hoac v. Becerra, No. 2:25-cv-01740-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 1993771 (E.D. Cal. July 16, 2025), Vuong v. Becerra, 1:25-cv-01847-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 3707172 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2025), and El-Ghazaly v. Chestnut, 1:25-cv-01621-DC-CKD, 2025 WL 3485030 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2025). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 8/13/2026. In their response, Respondents shall indicate whether Petitioner is in active removal proceedings and, if so, what the status of those proceedings are, and shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from Rodriguez Vazquez and this court's applicable orders cited above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 8/27/2026. Finally, the court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Both parties shall address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Aug 11, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Aug 11, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Immigration New Case Documents served on Eliexer Cortes Labrada. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
Aug 11, 2026
RECEIPT number 100009160 for $5.00 for Eliexer Cortes Labrada from Geo Secure Services, LLC. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
Aug 11, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 6, served on Eliexer Cortes Labrada. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
Aug 11, 2026
Service by Mail

Parties

(HC) Cortes Labrada
Party
Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility
Party