Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-05106

#1

Aug 10, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-22450183), filed by Maryoris Estefany Villalobos Bocanell. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet, # 2 Affidavit Verification of facts)(Hoffman, Meredith) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#2

Aug 10, 2026

MOTION for Order to Show Cause as to why Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be granted by Maryoris Estefany Villalobos Bocanell. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Order to Show Cause)(Hoffman, Meredith) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

Aug 10, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Aug 10, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

Aug 10, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (tt)

Aug 10, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (tt)

#3

Aug 11, 2026

TEXT ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) Petitioner's alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability; (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. Additionally, because this case appears to turn on whether Petitioners detention without a bond hearing violates the due process rights afforded to noncitizens who have established a substantial presence in the United States, Respondents must consider the Courts prior orders addressing this question and note any material factual differences between those cases and this one. E.g., Valencia Reyes v. Noem, No. SA-25-CV-1921-XR, 2026 WL 981034 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2026); Gonzalez Carrillo v. Bondi, No. SA-26-CV-778-XR, 2026 WL 981037 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026). If Respondents so choose, in lieu of a full response, they may instead file a response indicating that there are no material factual differences here and preserving all legal arguments made by the Federal Respondents in those cases. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. (Entered: 08/11/2026)

Aug 11, 2026

Text Order MOOTING 2 Motion for Order to Show Cause entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez in light of the Court's service order 3 . (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb)

Aug 11, 2026

Order

Aug 11, 2026

Order on Motion to Show Cause

#4

Aug 18, 2026

Response

#5

Aug 24, 2026

Reply to Response to Motion