District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13643

Derisier v. Moniz

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 10, 2026
Assigned to: Leo Theodore Sorokin
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 20, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 10, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Aug 10, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (SP) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
#3
Aug 10, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (FGD) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
#4
Aug 10, 2026
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (FGD) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document: Service Order-2241 Petition
#5
Aug 10, 2026
Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to Duty AUSA and mailed to Respondents and USAO on 8/10/2026. (FGD) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Aug 10, 2026
Copy Mailed
Aug 10, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#6
Aug 11, 2026
RESPONSE/ANSWER to by Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#7
Aug 11, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Tolkoff on behalf of Todd Blanche, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella, David Wesling (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/11/2026)
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#8
Aug 12, 2026
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. The Court has reviewed the petition and the answer filed today, in which the respondents acknowledge that Petitioner is eligible for a bond hearing conducted pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). Doc. No. 6 . This concession was made on behalf of all respondents in this case and, therefore, is binding on ICE and the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice. In light of the foregoing, the Court construes—and ORDERS the respondents to likewise construe—the pending petition as conveying a request for a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The Court further ORDERS that such a hearing shall be scheduled (if it has not already been scheduled) to occur by August 19, 2026; that the legal standard governing such hearing is as established by the First Circuit in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons; that, in determining whether the government has met its burden of proof as to risk of flight or danger, the immigration judge shall consider whether any condition, combination of conditions, or less-restrictive alternative to detention would ameliorate such risk; and that the respondents shall not retaliate against Petitioner for the filing of this action. The parties shall file a joint status report by August 25, 2026, notifying the Court of whether a bond hearing has occurred and, if so, its outcome. The merits of the habeas petition remain under advisement pending receipt and review of that status report.(FGD) (Entered: 08/12/2026)
Aug 12, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines
#9
Aug 19, 2026
Status Report
Main Document: Status Report
#11
Aug 20, 2026
Order Dismissing Case
Main Document: Order Dismissing Case
Aug 20, 2026
Order