Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06312

#1

Aug 10, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews by Carlos Lara Jimenez. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13706940) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Nathan) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#2

Aug 10, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#3

Aug 10, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Tonya Andrews,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Moises Becerra,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin,Elisa M. Rodriguez for David J. Venturella (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#4

Aug 12, 2026

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Petition Should not be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Erin Guy Castillo on 08/11/2026. Show Cause Response due within Five-Days. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

#5

Aug 13, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Carlos Lara Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Attorney, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Petitioner, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Spouse, # 5 Exhibit Checklist, # 6 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brown, Nathan) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

#6

Aug 13, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 8/13/2062: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 5 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by claim one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, 817 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Cal. 2025); Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01622-KES-CDB (HC), 2025 WL 3501200 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2025); W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01489-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3236521 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2025); Bilal A. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01715-KES-HBK (HC), 2025 WL 3648366 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2025); Marina V.N. v. Robbins, No. 1:25-CV-01845-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3701960 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 5 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before August 17, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Luis Alberto R.C. v. Murray, Elmer Joel M. C. v. Wofford, W.V.S.M. v. Wofford, Bilal A. v. Wofford, and Marina V.N. v. Robbins and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (gm) (Entered: 08/13/2026)

Aug 13, 2026

Minute Order

#7

Aug 17, 2026

RESPONSE by Tonya Andrews, Moises Becerra, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella to 6 Minute Order,,,,,,,,,. (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 08/17/2026)

#8

Aug 20, 2026

ORDER GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and REQUIRING Immediate Release, signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 8/20/2026. Respondents are ORDERED to release petitioner Carlos Lara Jimenez (A-Number: A-201-153-437) immediately. Respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining petitioner unless they demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence at a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral decisionmaker, that petitioner is a flight risk or danger to the community such that his physical custody is legally justified. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 08/20/2026)

#9

Aug 20, 2026

JUDGMENT dated *8/20/2026* pursuant to 8 order. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 08/20/2026)