Central District of California • 5:26-cv-04485
Karapet Gevorgian v. James Janecka
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 08, 2026
Assigned to:
Rozella A. Oliver
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
August 10, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 08, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), with filing fee previously paid ($5 paid on 08/08/2026, receipt number 43004040), filed by Petitioner KARAPET GEVORGIAN. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit) (Attorney Armine Antonyan added to party KARAPET GEVORGIAN(pty:pet))(Antonyan, Armine) (Entered: 08/08/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Aug 10, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner KARAPET GEVORGIAN. (Antonyan, Armine) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document:
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#3
Aug 10, 2026
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Petitioner KARAPET GEVORGIAN. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration of counsel) (Antonyan, Armine) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#4
Aug 10, 2026
The Petitioner has voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (et) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/10/2026)
#5
Aug 10, 2026
Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (et) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document:
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#6
Aug 10, 2026
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
#7
Aug 10, 2026
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: denying 3 Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Pursuant to General Order No. 26-05, the Court set an expedited briefing schedule for the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. It is not certain that the merits of the TRO motion can be decided before the merits of the habeas petition. Even if there is a delay that results from awarding relief to Petitioner on the merits of the petition, it would be brief. Accordingly, the Court concludes that awarding relief via a TRO is not warranted. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). For these reasons, the application is DENIED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY)(RAO) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Aug 10, 2026
2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination
Aug 10, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney