District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13630

#1

Aug 08, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11946201 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Segundo Manuel Caguana Loja. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(MacMurray, Kevin) Modified on 8/10/2026 Removing Duplicate Text. (NMC). (Entered: 08/08/2026)

#2

Aug 10, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Brian E. Murphy assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (SP) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#3

Aug 10, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MBM) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#4

Aug 10, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ORDER entered. ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL.Respondents shall determine whether Petitioner is a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, No. 25-CV-12664-PBS (D. Mass.), and notify the Court no later than 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 11, 2026.Respondents shall provide any further answer to the Petition, if necessary, no later than 1:00 p.m. on Friday, August 14, 2026.(MBM) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#5

Aug 10, 2026

Copy re 4 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) emailed to Duty AUSA Julien Mundele and USAMA Civil Process, mailed to each respondents on 8/10/2026. (MBM) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#6

Aug 10, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered DENYING Petitioners request for a temporary restraining order. Petitioners petition purports to seek a temporary restraining order. See Dkt. 1 at 8-9. To the extent Petitioner intends the Court to construe his petition simultaneously as a motion for a temporary restraining order, that would be improper. See Scott v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2025 WL 1314248, at *1 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2025) (If a litigant seeks injunctive relief prior to the final resolution of the case, they must also file a separate motion for a preliminary injunction identifying the relief sought and an accompanying memorandum providing factual and legal support for the motion.). Further, Petitioners filing fails to meet the requirements for preliminary injunctive relief or a temporary restraining order pursuant to the Court's Local Rules or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, which require, inter alia, (1) the submission of a memorandum of reasons to support any motion, see Local Rule 7.1(b)(1); and (2) either notice to the adverse party or certification to support an ex parte order, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1); see also DuBois v. Alves, 2022 WL 4376041, at *5 (D. Mass. Aug. 22, 2022) (denying motion in part due to the failure to comply with Local Rules or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65). The Court notes also that, in any case, the relief Petitioner seeks--a stay of transfer out of the district--has already been granted by the Court's stay order, Dkt. 4, and therefore the request appears to be moot. As such, Petitioners request for an emergency temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. Respondents are still to respond to the merits of Petitioners habeas petition by the dates set out in Dkt. 4 . (MBM) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

#7

Aug 10, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Erica McMahon on behalf of Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullen, David Venturella, David Wesling (McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 08/10/2026)

Aug 10, 2026

Copy Mailed

Aug 10, 2026

Order

Aug 10, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

#8

Aug 11, 2026

RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), by Todd Blanche, Patricia Hyde, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullen, David Venturella, David Wesling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(McMahon, Erica) (Entered: 08/11/2026)

#9

Aug 11, 2026

Judge Brian E. Murphy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Respondents submit that the legal issues presented in this Petition are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Martinez v. Hyde, No. 25-cv-11613-BEM, __ F. Supp. 3d __, 2025 WL 2084238 (D. Mass. July 24, 2025), and Romero v. Hyde, No. 25-cv-11631-BEM, __ F. Supp. 3d __, 2025 WL 2403827 (D. Mass. Aug. 19, 2025). Dkt. 8 at 1; see alsoDkt.[ 8 -1] at 5 (Warrant for Arrest of Alien under sections 236 and 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act). In addition, Respondents assert that Petitioner appears to be a member of the class certified in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, Civil Action No. 25-cv-12664-PBS, 2025 WL 3687757, at *10 (D. Mass. Dec. 19, 2025). Dkt. 8 at 1 n.1. Accordingly, Petitioner is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. [s.] 1226(a). Guerrero Orellana, 2025 WL 3687757, at *10.For the reasons stated in the cases cited by Respondents, this Petition is GRANTED in part. Respondents shall release Petitioner by 5:00 pm on Tuesday, August 18, 2026, unless, before that time, Petitioner is provided a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. s. 1226(a). Respondents are further ORDERED to file a status report within 24 hours of the Immigration Judges decision on bond, stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial, or whether he has been released, and if so, the date, time, and location of his release. Respondents should include a copy of the IJs decision with their status report.Any request for fees should be filed within the deadlines set by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. s. 2412.(MBM) (Entered: 08/11/2026)

Aug 11, 2026

Order

#10

Aug 20, 2026

Status Report

#11

Aug 20, 2026

Judgment