Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-06256
(HC) Cardoso Reyes v. Warden, Central Valley Annex
Active
Case Information
Filed: August 06, 2026
Assigned to:
Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to:
Sean C. Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
August 17, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Aug 06, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex by Diesky Cardoso Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Aug 06, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Diesky Cardoso Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
Aug 06, 2026
RECEIPT number 100009097 for $5.00 from Diesky Cardoso Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)
#3
Aug 07, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Attachments: # 1 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk KEZ) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Aug 07, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Quinn Disparte, GOVT for Warden, Central Valley Annex (Disparte, Quinn) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Aug 07, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 8/7/2026: *The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in Count 1 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before August 12, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Aug 07, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Diesky Cardoso Reyes. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)
Aug 07, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Diesky Cardoso Reyes. (Deputy Clerk GJM)
Aug 07, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Aug 07, 2026
Service by Mail
#7
Aug 17, 2026
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Main Document:
Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#8
Aug 17, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Aug 17, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Cardoso Reyes
Party
Warden, Central Valley Annex
Party