District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-13568

Niang v. Moniz

Active

Case Information

Filed: August 05, 2026
Assigned to: Allison Dale Burroughs
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: August 25, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Aug 05, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Sasha Niang. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement). (FGD) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Aug 05, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (JAM) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
#3
Aug 05, 2026
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition and Stay of Transfer or Removal. The answer or responsive pleading is due no later than August 17, 2026. (JAM) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document: Order
#4
Aug 05, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (JAM) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document: General Order 19-02
#5
Aug 05, 2026
Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to Duty AUSA Weinstein and mailed to All Respondents on 8/5/2026. (JAM) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
#6
Aug 05, 2026
Copy re 3 Order and 4 General Order 19-02 mailed to Sasha Niang on 8/5/2026. (JAM) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
#7
Aug 05, 2026
Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100016222 for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (NVB) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Aug 05, 2026
Filing Fee/Payment Received
Aug 05, 2026
Copy Mailed
Aug 05, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#8
Aug 10, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#9
Aug 17, 2026
RESPONSE/ANSWER to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Antone Moniz, Markwayne Mullin. (Tolkoff, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/17/2026)
Main Document: Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Aug 20, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
Aug 20, 2026
Order Reassigning Case
#12
Aug 25, 2026
Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Sasha Niang. Having reviewed the Petition of Sasha Mikael Ethan Niang ("Petitioner") for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, D. 1, and Respondents' response to same, D. 9, the Court DENIES the Petition. Petitioner has been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") since March 25, 2026, D. 1 at 4; D. 1-1 at 2, and now raises a Fifth Amendment due process claim and seeks release from detention or, in the alternative, an order that that he not be transferred from this District, D. 1 at 6-7. Petitioner previously sought habeas relief on "substantially similar claims," D. 10, which this Court denied, reasoning that Petitioner was not entitled to a bond hearing, but instead was "subject to the 90-day mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(2)" due to his Visa Waiver Program ("VWP") Final Administrative Removal Order ("FARO"), issued March 25, 2026, Niang v. Moniz et al., No. 26-cv-11882-DJC (D. Mass. June 17, 2026), D. 8. Although such 90-day period has since expired, id., "the removal period may be extended if the alien is . . . removable as a result of violations of status requirements," D'Ambrosio v. McDonald, 793 F. Supp. 3d 271, 278 n.8 (D. Mass. 2025) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, 594 U.S. 523, 529 (2021)), and here, Petitioner was issued a FARO as a "VWP violator," Niang, No. 26-cv-11882-DJC, D. 8. See Pina Barbosa v. Moniz, No. 26-cv-12062-AK, 2026 WL 2279896, at *2 (D. Mass. Aug. 7, 2026) (providing that "the government may detain an individual beyond the ninety-day removal period" when they have been determined "'removable as a result of status requirements'" (quoting Johnson, 594 U.S. at 528-29)). Further, as noted by Respondents, D. 9 at 1, Petitioner remains in detention because Petitioner is appealing his order of removal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, D. 1 at 5, see Rodriguez-Guardado v. Smith, 271 F. Supp. 3d 331, 335 (D. Mass. 2017) (providing that "numerous courts, including the First Circuit, have found delays attributable to an alien's legal challenges to a removal order to extend the 90–day removal period"). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Petition.(SEC) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
#13
Aug 25, 2026
Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. ORDER OF DISMISSAL. (SEC) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document: Order Dismissing Case
Aug 25, 2026
Order